Author: Harvey

With Resident Evil 9: Requiem set to release in February 2026, fans are already looking ahead to what comes next for the franchise. Capcom confirmed back in late 2023 that more remakes are indeed on the way, but with RE9 being their main focus, all we can really go on are leaks and rumors from various sources. The latest information suggests that two highly anticipated remakes are currently in development: Resident Evil Code Veronica and Resident Evil Zero, though both projects appear to have faced some development challenges.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Source: Dusk Golem’s Track Record

Before diving into the specific rumors, it’s important to acknowledge that most of this information comes from insider Dusk Golem (also known as AestheticGamer), a leaker with a notoriously mixed track record. While he has been correct about some Resident Evil details over the years, he’s also gotten quite a bit wrong, leading many in the community to approach his claims with skepticism. However, given the lack of official information from Capcom, these rumors represent the most substantial information we have about future remakes.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category – from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Resident Evil Zero Remake: Development Troubles

According to Dusk Golem’s recent claims, Resident Evil Zero remake has encountered significant development issues. The leaker reported that the game “recently got delayed, citing some form of development reboot that occurred late last year in 2024.” This suggests that whatever progress had been made on the project was deemed unsatisfactory, forcing the development team to start over or make major changes to their approach.

Development Team Details

Dusk maintained that both K2 and M2 – the teams responsible for Resident Evil 4 remake’s Separate Ways DLC – were working on the Zero remake. This collaboration makes sense given both teams’ experience with the RE Engine and their proven ability to handle classic Resident Evil content with modern sensibilities.

Limited Information Available

Unfortunately, beyond these development troubles, very little specific information has emerged about what the Zero remake might entail. The original Resident Evil Zero was notable for its partner-swapping mechanic between Rebecca Chambers and Billy Coen, its prequel story set before the events of the first game, and its challenging difficulty. How these elements would be adapted for modern audiences remains unclear.

Code Veronica Remake: The Most Requested Entry

Resident Evil Code Veronica remake appears to be in much better shape, according to the same sources. This makes sense, as Code Veronica is widely considered the most requested remake among fans, having been skipped over when Capcom moved from the RE3 remake to RE4 remake.

Strong Development Progress

Dusk reported that “development on the Code Veronica remake is going exceptionally well. So well in fact that this remake is apparently ahead of Capcom’s internal schedule, remarking that the team behind the Code Veronica remake is very confident in the work that they are making.”

This positive development news contrasts sharply with the reported troubles surrounding the Zero remake, suggesting that Code Veronica might see release significantly earlier than originally planned.

Development Team Leadership

Mainline Treatment

In another tweet, Dusk emphasized the scope of the project: “For what it’s worth, from what I’ve heard a few times now actually, Code Veronica Remake not only is being handled by a lot of the same people as RE:2 & RE:4, but it’s being treated as a big budget mainline Resident Evil game in every way”.

He also revealed the development timeline: “Code Veronica Remake has been in development since 2022, around 3 years of dev now. Code Veronica Remake is ahead of schedule due to a very smooth dev cycle though”.

Potential Announcement Timeline

Dusk suggested that Code Veronica remake could be announced sometime in 2026 as part of Resident Evil’s 30th anniversary celebration, coinciding with RE9’s release. This timing would make strategic sense for Capcom, allowing them to maintain franchise momentum after RE9’s launch while capitalizing on the anniversary celebration.

Rumored Gameplay and Story Changes for Code Veronica

The most intriguing aspect of the Code Veronica remake rumors involves specific gameplay and story modifications that could significantly alter the original experience.

Wesker Boss Fight Addition

One of the most significant rumored changes involves Albert Wesker’s role in the game. According to Dusk, “instead of a cutscene playing out depicting Albert Wesker’s fight with Chris Redfield, the remake will instead have Chris face off against Wesker in a boss fight.”

This change would be substantial, as the original Code Veronica featured Wesker’s confrontation with Chris primarily through cutscenes. Making this encounter playable could provide a satisfying gameplay moment similar to Leon’s knife battle with Jack Krauser in RE4 remake, replacing what were originally Quick Time Event-heavy sequences with full player control.

Chris vs. Alexia Fight Removal

Interestingly, the same source claims that “Chris no longer fights Alexia here, which implies that this fight is seemingly going to be absent from the game or perhaps was replaced with Wesker’s boss fight.” This would be a surprising change, as Alexia Ashford serves as one of Code Veronica’s primary antagonists. However, it’s possible that this fight could be relocated to another character (perhaps Claire) or restructured in ways that weren’t clear from the leaked information.

Expanded HCF Role

The rumors suggest that Wesker will play a much larger role in the remake, “due in large part to the HCF, standing for Hive or Host Capture Force, which will serve as a main plot point in the remake.” The HCF (Hunk’s Capture Force) was Wesker’s special operations unit, and expanding their role could provide better setup for future games, particularly if Capcom eventually decides to remake Resident Evil 5.

Getting a better understanding of this highly trained group of soldiers and their relationship to Wesker could add depth to the overall narrative while providing more context for Wesker’s activities between Code Veronica and RE5.

Steve Burnside Personality Overhaul

One of the most welcome rumored changes involves Steve Burnside, a character who has been widely criticized for his annoying personality and cringe-worthy dialogue in the original game. According to Dusk, “Steve Burnside is also slated to get a personality overhaul. Steve Burnside is going to be a bit more palatable here and less cringey at times while still keeping some of his quirky traits intact.”

This change could significantly improve the game’s reception, as Steve’s character was often cited as one of Code Veronica’s weakest elements. Maintaining his core personality while making him more likeable would be a delicate balance, but one that could pay off substantially.

Semi-Open World Rockfort Island

Perhaps the most ambitious rumored change involves the game’s structure. Dusk claims that “Rockfort Island will become a semi-open world area, adding greater exploration and freedom to this eerie setting.” This would represent a significant departure from the original’s highly linear progression through the island facility.

Such a change could make traversing Rockfort Island more immersive and potentially less frustrating than the original’s sometimes confusing layout. However, it would also represent a major structural overhaul that could fundamentally change how the game feels to play.

Release Timeline Expectations

Despite the positive development news surrounding Code Veronica, both remakes are still years away from release. Even with Code Veronica allegedly ahead of schedule, Dusk maintained that either remake could release in 2027, with the other following in 2028.

This timeline makes sense given Capcom’s apparent strategy of spacing out their major Resident Evil releases. With RE9 launching in February 2026, having the next remake arrive in 2027 would provide adequate time for RE9 to have its moment while maintaining regular franchise releases.

Other Potential Remakes: What’s Not in Development

Interestingly, the same source claims that certain other rumored remakes are not currently in development. Specifically, Dusk reported that there is “no Resident Evil 5 remake in development at the moment,” and that “the much rumored Resident Evil 1 re-remake is not in development as far as he knew.”

This information, if accurate, suggests that Capcom is focusing their remake efforts on the games that haven’t received modern treatment rather than revisiting titles that have already been updated (like RE1) or moving forward to entries that might require more complex handling (like RE5’s controversial elements).

The Importance of Skepticism

While these rumors paint an exciting picture of the franchise’s future, it’s crucial to remember that none of this information has been officially confirmed by Capcom. Dusk Golem’s track record includes both accurate predictions and significant misses, and the gaming industry is notorious for projects changing direction, being cancelled, or evolving substantially during development.

The reported development reboot for Zero remake demonstrates how fluid these projects can be. What seems certain today might be completely different by the time these games actually release – if they release at all.

What This Means for Resident Evil’s Future

Assuming even some of these rumors prove accurate, they suggest that Capcom is committed to continuing the remake series while making substantial improvements to address known issues with the original games. The rumored changes to Steve Burnside and the structural modifications to Rockfort Island show a willingness to make bold alterations rather than simply updating graphics and controls.

This approach could result in remakes that feel genuinely fresh while honoring the original games’ core appeal. However, it also carries the risk of alienating fans who prefer faithful recreations over reimaginings.

Looking Ahead: The Remake Strategy

The focus on Code Veronica and Zero makes strategic sense for Capcom. Both games represent significant gaps in the modern Resident Evil catalog—important entries that newcomers can’t easily experience in updated form. Code Veronica, in particular, contains crucial story elements involving the Ashford family and Claire’s character development that are referenced throughout the series.

By modernizing these games, Capcom can provide complete access to the franchise’s history while potentially improving on elements that didn’t age well. The rumored timeline also suggests a sustainable release schedule that could keep the franchise active for years to come.

Conclusion: Patience and Cautious Optimism

While these rumors provide tantalizing glimpses of what might be coming next for Resident Evil remakes, fans would be wise to approach them with cautious optimism. The development troubles surrounding Zero remake serve as a reminder that game development is unpredictable, and even well-sourced rumors can prove inaccurate.

What seems clear is that Capcom recognizes the value of their remake strategy and intends to continue it beyond the current generation of releases. Whether that means we’ll see the specific changes rumored for Code Veronica and Zero remains to be seen, but the prospect of experiencing these classic games with modern technology and design sensibilities is exciting regardless of the exact details.

For now, fans can look forward to RE9 in February 2026 while keeping an eye out for official announcements about future remakes. If the rumors prove true, the late 2020s could be an incredibly exciting time for Resident Evil fans, with both new entries and modernized classics providing plenty of survival horror content to enjoy.

When Resident Evil Village ended with that tantalizing glimpse of Chris Redfield investigating the BSAA’s use of bioweapons, many fans expected Resident Evil 9 to pick up that thread immediately. The final scenes showed Chris discovering that the BSAA had been deploying bioweapons instead of human soldiers, setting up what seemed like a major conspiracy storyline that would drive the next entry. However, as we’ve learned more about RE9: Requiem, it’s become clear that Capcom is taking the story in a completely different direction – one that returns to Raccoon City and introduces new protagonist Grace Ashcroft. While this might disappoint some fans hoping for immediate answers about the BSAA conspiracy, it’s actually perfectly in line with Capcom’s storytelling approach throughout the series’ nearly three-decade history.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

Capcom’s Long History of Unresolved Cliffhangers

Director Koshi Nakanishi recently addressed this exact concern in a comprehensive interview, explaining that this approach is nothing new for the franchise: “I think it’s a common experience with Resident Evil games where we don’t exactly pick up the exact thread that was left on the previous game. You know, [RE6] ended on a sort of tease of Jake, the character from that game, possibly seeing where he might go next. And then Resident Evil 7 was totally different protagonist, for example.”

This pattern has been remarkably consistent throughout the series’ history, creating a web of unresolved storylines that could theoretically be picked up at any time. Consider these significant examples:

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category – from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Resident Evil 6’s Jake Muller Setup

Perhaps the most glaring example of an abandoned cliffhanger is Jake Muller from Resident Evil 6. The game ended with Jake, Albert Wesker’s son, establishing himself as a freelance mercenary fighting bioterrorism incidents around the world. The final cutscene showed him taking on contracts to help people affected by bioweapons, leveraging his superhuman abilities inherited from his father’s viral enhancements. This setup was so obvious that many fans assumed Jake would become a recurring character, possibly even the protagonist of RE7. Instead, he vanished completely from the series, with no mentions or references in subsequent games.

The Sherry and Jake Dynamic

RE6 also established a compelling relationship between Sherry Birkin and Jake Muller – two characters with unique viral immunities that could have driven fascinating future storylines. Sherry, infected with the G-Virus as a child in RE2, had developed incredible regenerative abilities. Jake possessed antibodies that made him immune to the C-Virus. Together, they represented a new generation of characters who could survive in bioweapon-infested environments in ways that traditional protagonists couldn’t. The game strongly hinted at a romantic relationship developing between them, and their combined abilities suggested they could be perfect partners for future bioterrorism investigations. Yet this dynamic was completely abandoned, leaving fans to wonder what happened to both characters.

Code Veronica’s Steve Burnside Mystery

While not exactly a cliffhanger, Steve Burnside’s fate in Code Veronica created questions that remain unanswered decades later. After being infected with the T-Veronica virus and apparently dying while saving Claire, Steve’s body was taken by Albert Wesker, who stated he might be useful for his plans. This clear setup for Steve’s potential return – possibly as a bioweapon or test subject – was never explored in any subsequent game. The 2023 rumors about Steve getting a personality overhaul in a potential Code Veronica remake suggest Capcom might finally address this loose thread, but it’s taken over 20 years to even consider it.

The Umbrella Chronicles Revelations

Even the Chronicles games, designed to fill in backstory gaps, created their own unresolved elements. The destruction of Umbrella’s Russian facility and various character fates established in these games have never been properly followed up in mainline entries, despite containing significant story developments.

The RE7/RE8 Exception That Proves the Rule

Interestingly, Resident Evil 7 and 8 represent the rare exception to this pattern – they’re the only two mainline games that directly continue each other’s story with the same protagonist and supporting cast. As one content creator noted in their analysis: “Seven and eight were the only two games where eight was like the direct sequel of something which was seven. It was the direct sequel from seven. Those are the only two games that were basically connected.”

This direct connection was unusual for the series and created expectations that this new approach might continue. The Winters saga told a complete story arc across two games, following Ethan’s journey from RE7’s Louisiana bayou to Village’s European setting, culminating in his sacrifice to save his daughter Rose. This narrative cohesion was refreshing for long-time fans who had grown accustomed to fragmented storylines.

However, this exception actually makes the shift away from the BSAA storyline in RE9 even more notable, while simultaneously representing a return to the series’ traditional approach of jumping between different storylines and protagonists.

The Pattern of Franchise Reinvention

Looking at the series’ history, each numbered entry has often served as a soft reboot or significant pivot point:

• RE1 to RE2: Moved from the isolated mansion to an urban outbreak
• RE2 to RE3: Expanded the Raccoon City incident with new perspectives
• RE3 to RE4: Completely overhauled gameplay and moved to a rural European setting
• RE4 to RE5: Shifted to co-op action in Africa
• RE5 to RE6: Attempted a globe-spanning action epic
• RE6 to RE7: Returned to horror roots with a completely new perspective and protagonist
• RE8 to RE9: Another perspective shift while returning to series origins

This pattern suggests that major narrative shifts aren’t anomalies – they’re fundamental to how Capcom approaches the franchise’s evolution.

Returning to Mainline RE Story Elements

Nakanishi explained the reasoning behind focusing on Raccoon City instead of the BSAA in detail: “Although, at the end of Village, we saw Chris Redfield at the BSAA in action. We decided to return to the more general mainline story of the series for this entry. So, it’s looking towards Raccoon City. And after so many years not having seen this location, catching up on where we’re at with that and picking that up as the main thread.”

This decision represents a conscious choice to:

Reconnect with Series Origins

Raccoon City represents the foundation of everything that defines Resident Evil. The location where the T-Virus outbreak first reached public attention, where Umbrella’s crimes were exposed, and where legendary characters like Leon Kennedy, Claire Redfield, and Jill Valentine had their defining experiences. By returning to this location 30 years later, RE9 can explore the long-term consequences of those original events in ways that previous games haven’t addressed.

Explore Untold Stories

The game’s synopsis mentions a “hidden truth” about the Raccoon City incident, suggesting that even after decades of games, movies, and supplemental material, there are still secrets to uncover. This approach allows Capcom to revisit their most iconic setting while justifying it with new revelations rather than simple nostalgia.

Bridge Old and New

Grace Ashcroft’s connection to Alyssa Ashcroft (a character from the often-overlooked Outbreak games) demonstrates how RE9 aims to honor deep-cut series lore while introducing new characters. This approach satisfies longtime fans while providing entry points for newcomers.

Focus on Government Conspiracy Elements

RE9’s emphasis on government cover-ups and hidden truths returns to themes that were central to early games but haven’t been fully explored in recent entries.

Different Directors, Different Visions

The change in creative leadership from Village to RE9 cannot be understated in understanding this narrative shift. Nakanishi, who directed RE7 and is now directing RE9, was not involved in Village’s development. This change naturally brings different priorities and storytelling approaches.

Nakanishi’s Horror Philosophy

Nakanishi has consistently demonstrated a preference for psychological horror over action spectacle. His approach to RE7 emphasized claustrophobic tension, resource scarcity, and genuine terror – elements that defined classic Resident Evil games. In interviews about RE9, he’s mentioned wanting to create a “roller coaster” of tension and release that exceeds previous entries in the series.

Thematic Consistency

Nakanishi has shown particular interest in exploring themes of family, trauma, and the cost of survival. RE7 dealt with a dysfunctional family corrupted by bioweapons, while RE9 focuses on a daughter uncovering the truth about her mother’s death. This thematic throughline suggests a director more interested in personal stories than global conspiracies.

Connections to Previous Work

There are strong hints that RE9 will connect to RE7 through the Connections crime syndicate, potentially providing closure to storylines that Nakanishi himself established. This personal investment in resolving his own narrative threads makes more sense than picking up another director’s cliffhanger.

The BSAA Story Isn’t Dead – Just Dormant

Nakanishi was careful to reassure fans that abandoning the immediate BSAA storyline doesn’t mean those characters and plots are gone forever: “It doesn’t mean those other characters aren’t out there somewhere getting on with business, but we’re just not showing you just yet… So rest assured and I’m sure Chris is out in action somewhere in the world but for now we’re not really looking at him and we’re looking at somewhere different.”

This statement suggests several possibilities:

Future Mainline Entries

The BSAA conspiracy could easily serve as the foundation for RE10 or beyond, especially if Capcom decides to return to Chris as a protagonist.

DLC or Spin-off Content

The investigation could be explored in downloadable content, similar to how “Not a Hero” DLC for RE7 provided closure to Chris’s story in that game.

Multimedia Expansions

Capcom has increasingly used CGI movies, novels, and other media to explore storylines that don’t fit into mainline games. The BSAA conspiracy could be perfect for this treatment.

Background Integration

RE9 might include documents, files, or references that provide updates on the BSAA situation without making it the central focus.

Why This Approach Actually Benefits the Series

While some fans might be frustrated by unresolved cliffhangers, this approach actually serves the series well in several important ways:

Maintaining Narrative Flexibility

By not being locked into direct sequels, each game can explore different themes, tones, and gameplay styles without being constrained by previous setups. This flexibility has allowed the series to reinvent itself multiple times over nearly three decades.

Creating a Living World

When characters and storylines continue “off-screen,” it creates the impression of a larger, more complex world where multiple events are happening simultaneously. This approach makes the Resident Evil universe feel more realistic and expansive.

Preventing Character Overexposure

Constantly following the same characters and conflicts could make the series feel stale or reduce the impact of major story moments. By rotating focus between different protagonists and storylines, Capcom keeps each appearance feeling special.

Allowing for Organic Story Development

Rather than forcing connections between games, this approach allows stories to develop naturally over time. When characters do return, it’s because their story has something meaningful to contribute, not because they were set up in a previous cliffhanger.

Supporting Long-term Series Longevity

Multiple ongoing plot threads mean multiple potential directions for future games, ensuring that the series can continue evolving without running out of story possibilities.

What This Means for RE9’s Identity

Instead of a BSAA investigation thriller featuring established characters, RE9 is positioning itself as:

A Return to Horror Roots

The game emphasizes survival horror over action, featuring a vulnerable protagonist who must grow stronger throughout her journey rather than starting as a capable action hero.

An Exploration of Legacy and Trauma

Grace’s investigation into her mother’s death provides a personal stakes narrative that grounds the larger conspiracy in emotional reality.

A Bridge Between Eras

By featuring locations and characters from throughout the series’ history while introducing new elements, RE9 serves as both a celebration of the franchise’s past and a foundation for its future.

A Focused Narrative Experience

Rather than trying to juggle multiple ongoing storylines, RE9 can tell a complete, focused story that serves its themes and characters effectively.

The Broader Pattern in Gaming

This approach isn’t unique to Resident Evil. Many long-running game franchises use similar strategies:

• Grand Theft Auto typically features new protagonists and locations
• The Elder Scrolls advances the timeline significantly between games
• Assassin’s Creed has moved between different historical periods and characters

These approaches allow franchises to stay fresh while maintaining core identity elements that define the series.

Looking Forward: What Fans Can Expect

For fans disappointed about the BSAA cliffhanger, it’s worth remembering that Resident Evil has always been about patience and long-term storytelling. The Chris/BSAA plot will likely be resolved eventually – just not in the way or timeline many expected.

In the meantime, RE9 offers the opportunity to:

• Explore new corners of the RE universe
• Return to the location that started everything
• Experience classic survival horror gameplay with modern design sensibilities
• Discover what “hidden truths” about Raccoon City have remained buried for three decades

As the series approaches its 30th anniversary in 2026 (the same year RE9 releases), this blend of new stories with classic locations might be exactly what Resident Evil needs to continue evolving while honoring its roots. The BSAA conspiracy isn’t going anywhere – it’s simply waiting for its proper time to shine, just like so many other storylines that have enriched the Resident Evil universe over the years.

Rather than seeing this as abandoning Village’s setup, fans might consider it as Capcom returning to what has always made Resident Evil special: the willingness to surprise players and explore new directions while never forgetting where the series began.

As Resident Evil 9 Requiem approaches, a compelling debate emerges within the gaming community: should beloved legacy characters face permanent endings, or should they be preserved indefinitely? The Last of Us Part II’s controversial decision to kill Joel Miller provides a fascinating case study in both the risks and potential rewards of eliminating fan-favorite protagonists. With RE9’s return to Raccoon City potentially serving as a culmination of decades-old storylines, the question becomes increasingly relevant: what should Capcom do with characters like Leon Kennedy, Claire Redfield, and other franchise veterans?

The answer isn’t as straightforward as it might seem. Both preservation and elimination carry compelling arguments that reveal fundamental tensions between artistic integrity, fan service, and commercial viability.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Case for Character Deaths: Artistic Integrity and Emotional Impact

Narrative Authenticity: After 30+ years of bioweapons incidents, government conspiracies, and impossible survival scenarios, the idea that every main character continues to survive strains credibility. Real people die in dangerous situations – even skilled, experienced people. Allowing characters to face permanent consequences would add weight and realism to RE9’s horror elements.

Emotional Stakes: When players know that beloved characters are essentially immortal due to plot armor, tension diminishes significantly. Joel’s death in The Last of Us Part II, while controversial, created genuine emotional impact precisely because players didn’t expect it. RE9 could achieve similar emotional resonance by putting legacy characters at real risk.

Character Arc Completion: Some storylines naturally reach endpoints that death could serve meaningfully. Leon’s journey from rookie cop to government agent could conclude with a heroic sacrifice that defines his legacy. Claire’s investigative work could lead her into danger that finally proves fatal. These deaths could provide satisfying narrative closure rather than indefinite continuation.

Generational Transition: Grace Ashcroft represents a new generation of protagonists. Having her mentor figures die – possibly while protecting her or helping her investigation -would complete the symbolic passing of the torch from old guard to new. This transition could feel more impactful than simply having older characters retire or disappear.

Creative Freedom: Preserving characters indefinitely limits storytelling options. Writers must constantly find new ways to challenge characters without permanently harming them, leading to increasingly contrived scenarios. Character deaths free future narratives from these constraints.

The Last of Us Part II’s Success: Despite controversy, TLOU2 won numerous awards, sold over 10 million copies, and is considered by many critics to be a masterpiece. Joel’s death, while painful for fans, served the story’s themes about cycles of violence and the costs of survival. Some argue the backlash came from players who couldn’t accept that their personal attachment to Joel wasn’t more important than the story being told.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category – from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

The Case Against Character Deaths: Fan Investment and Franchise Value

Fan Attachment Investment: Players have spent decades building emotional connections to these characters. Killing them feels like betraying that investment, particularly when fans have supported the franchise through multiple entries specifically because of these relationships.

The Last of Us Part II Backlash: While the game achieved critical success, the fan division was genuine and lasting. Many players felt manipulated and abandoned the franchise entirely. Social media remains filled with negative reactions years later, suggesting the damage was more significant than sales figures indicate.

Commercial Considerations: Leon Kennedy’s face sells games, merchandise, and movie tickets. Dead characters can’t anchor marketing campaigns or generate excitement for future releases. From a business perspective, killing valuable assets seems counterproductive.

Capcom’s Historical Pattern: The company has successfully avoided major character deaths for decades while maintaining franchise popularity. This suggests their current approach works and doesn’t require dramatic changes.

Alternative Drama Sources: RE9 can generate emotional stakes through other means – conspiracy revelations, monster encounters, environmental storytelling, and Grace’s personal journey. Character deaths aren’t necessary for effective horror or compelling drama.

The Daryl Dixon Phenomenon: Some characters become so beloved that killing them risks catastrophic fan backlash. Leon Kennedy has arguably achieved this status, where his death would overshadow any narrative benefits.

The Middle Ground: Risk Without Permanent Loss

Perhaps the most sophisticated approach involves putting characters in genuine danger without necessarily killing them:

Serious Consequences: Characters could face permanent injuries, trauma, or other lasting effects that change them without ending their stories entirely.

Temporary Deaths: Characters could appear to die but return later, providing emotional impact while preserving long-term value.

Retirement Endings: Legacy characters could step back from active bioweapons fighting, concluding their action-hero phases while remaining alive for potential future appearances.

Symbolic Deaths: Characters could “die” metaphorically – their old selves ending while new versions emerge, transformed by RE9’s events.

Genre Expectations and Horror Traditions

Horror games occupy unique narrative space regarding character mortality. Traditional horror often requires sacrifice and loss to achieve emotional impact, but video game horror operates differently:

Player Agency: Game protagonists succeed or fail based on player skill. Having characters die regardless of player performance can feel unfair or manipulative.

Franchise Continuity: Unlike standalone horror films, game franchises must balance individual story needs with long-term series considerations.

Commercial Realities: Horror films can kill protagonists because each entry stands alone. Game franchises risk damaging their most valuable assets.

Learning from Industry Examples

Game of Thrones: The TV series’ willingness to kill major characters initially strengthened storytelling but eventually contributed to fan alienation when deaths felt arbitrary rather than meaningful.

Marvel Cinematic Universe: Despite constant peril, most major characters survive because their commercial value outweighs narrative convenience. When deaths do occur (Iron Man, Black Widow), they serve clear story purposes and feel like natural conclusions.

The Walking Dead: The show’s frequent character deaths maintained tension but also led to viewer fatigue and declining ratings as fans became reluctant to invest in new characters.

The Stakes for RE9

The decision about legacy character mortality in RE9 carries implications beyond the game itself:

Franchise Future: How RE9 handles beloved characters will influence fan expectations for future entries and remakes.

Industry Precedent: Other franchises are watching to see whether The Last of Us Part II’s approach becomes a template or cautionary tale.

Fan Trust: Capcom’s relationship with longtime fans could be strengthened or damaged based on these choices.

What Seems Most Likely

Based on Capcom’s history, industry trends, and fan reactions to similar decisions elsewhere, RE9 will probably avoid killing major legacy characters. The company has demonstrated consistent risk aversion regarding beloved characters, and the mixed reception of The Last of Us Part II provides a clear warning about potential backlash.

However, the possibility remains that Capcom could surprise everyone. If the company believes RE9 represents a natural conclusion to certain character arcs, and if those deaths serve compelling narrative purposes, they might risk fan anger for artistic integrity.

The Fundamental Question

Ultimately, the debate reveals a fundamental tension in modern entertainment: should creators prioritize artistic vision or fan satisfaction? Should stories serve their own internal logic or preserve elements that audiences love?

The Last of Us Part II argued for artistic integrity over fan comfort. Resident Evil has traditionally chosen fan satisfaction over dramatic risk. RE9 will reveal which philosophy Capcom believes serves the franchise better.

Both approaches have merit. Both carry risks. The gaming industry will learn valuable lessons regardless of which path Capcom chooses – assuming they have the courage to make a definitive choice rather than playing it safe with preservation by default.

The conversation itself might be more valuable than the answer.

On October 1st, 1998, the United States government made an unprecedented decision: deploy an experimental thermobaric missile to completely destroy Raccoon City and contain the T-virus outbreak. For nearly three decades, the ruins have remained largely untouched, a devastated testament to one of the most catastrophic bioweapons incidents in history. Now, as Resident Evil 9 Requiem prepares to take us back to those haunted streets, the question isn’t whether we’ll recognize the city – it’s what horrors have grown in the shadow of thermobaric devastation.

Director Koshi Nakanishi has been remarkably candid about his approach to recreating post-apocalyptic Raccoon City. “We did essentially start with the existing design and layout of Raccoon City as has been seen most recently in Resident Evil 2 and 3 remakes,” he explained during a Games Radar interview at Gamescom 2025. “We thought it through. We were like, ‘Okay, well, this is where the bomb landed in the city. Then this would be the blast zone and the shock wave would maybe travel into these areas and that’s how they’d be affected.’”

This methodical approach to destruction suggests we’re not just getting generic ruins – we’re getting a scientifically considered vision of how thermobaric devastation would specifically affect Raccoon City’s most iconic locations.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Raccoon Police Department

Perhaps no location in Resident Evil history is more iconic than the RPD building, and Capcom has already confirmed its return in RE9’s marketing materials. The building’s unique architecture – originally designed as an art museum before being converted to police headquarters – presents fascinating questions about post-missile survival.

The RPD’s solid stone construction and underground passages suggest it might be among the most intact structures in the city. Museums are built to last, with thick walls designed to protect valuable artifacts. However, thirty years of neglect would have taken their toll in ways that zombies never could.

Expect to see:

• Collapsed sections where structural integrity finally failed after decades without maintenance
• Overgrown interiors as nature reclaims the building through broken windows and damaged roofing
• Flooded basement levels from decades of accumulated groundwater and damaged plumbing
• The famous main hall potentially still recognizable but dramatically weathered

The RPD’s underground passages and jail cells might have provided some protection from the initial blast, creating pockets of preserved evidence about the outbreak’s final hours. These areas could hold crucial clues about the “hidden truth” Grace seeks to uncover.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category — from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Raccoon General Hospital

The hospital where much of RE3’s action took place would likely present some of the most disturbing imagery in post-blast Raccoon City. Medical facilities contain equipment and chemicals that could create uniquely horrifying decay scenarios.

After thirty years, the hospital might feature:

• Contaminated medical waste still scattered throughout corridors, now fused with blast debris
• Collapsed operating theaters where surgical equipment has become twisted metal sculptures
• The clock tower (if RE9 includes this fan-favorite location) potentially still standing as a landmark but structurally unsound
• Underground morgue areas that might have preserved evidence of the outbreak’s final victims

The combination of medical horror imagery with missile devastation could create some of RE9’s most psychologically unsettling environments. Imagine IV drips and heart monitors now overgrown with mutated vegetation.

Kite Bros Railway: The Underground Network

Raccoon City’s underground train system represents one of the most intriguing post-blast environments. Underground structures often survive surface devastation better than buildings, but they present unique challenges after decades of abandonment.

The railway tunnels could feature:

• Flooded sections creating underground lakes in former train platforms
• Collapsed tunnel segments blocking traditional routes and creating new pathways
• The train cars themselves potentially preserved in some areas, rusted wrecks in others
• Emergency bunkers that might have sheltered survivors during the initial blast

These underground areas could serve crucial gameplay functions, providing protected routes through the city while harboring their own unique dangers. The darkness and confined spaces would amplify RE9’s horror elements while offering refuge from whatever threats roam the surface.

Spencer Mansion Region

While the Spencer Mansion itself was destroyed in the original Resident Evil, its location in the Arklay Mountains northwest of Raccoon City means the area might have escaped the worst blast effects. This region could serve as a bridge between RE9’s Raccoon City exploration and the broader Arklay Mountains lore.

Thirty years later, this area might feature:

• The mansion’s foundation still visible among overgrown forest
• Underground lab entrances sealed but potentially accessible
• The helipad area where Chris and Jill made their escape
• Umbrella research outposts that were abandoned but not destroyed

This region could provide context for how the T-virus outbreak began while showing how nature has reclaimed Umbrella’s experimental sites. The contrast between missile devastation in the city and natural overgrowth in the mountains could create striking visual storytelling.

Raccoon University

The university where the Daylight vaccine was developed represents crucial location for RE9’s plot. As the source of the cure that gave outbreak survivors their valuable antibodies, the university could hold vital information about the conspiracy Grace is investigating.

After three decades, the campus might feature:

• The chemistry building where Dr. Jenkins developed Daylight, potentially still containing research materials
• Lecture halls filled with debris but possibly preserving academic records
• Student dormitories creating maze-like environments through collapsed floors and walls
• The library where important documents might have survived in protected storage

The university’s significance to the Daylight vaccine subplot makes it a likely location for major story revelations. Hidden research about survivor antibodies could explain why Grace and her mother were targeted.

The Business District

Raccoon City’s downtown area, including Umbrella’s local offices and other corporate buildings, would present a unique vision of capitalism meeting thermobaric apocalypse. High-rise buildings would have suffered severe structural damage, creating a urban canyon landscape.

This area could include:

• Umbrella’s Raccoon City headquarters reduced to a skeletal frame but potentially containing archived research
• The mayor’s office where corruption and cover-up decisions were made
• Corporate lobbies now filled with debris but possibly preserving important documentation
• Rooftop areas offering vantage points across the ruined city

The business district could serve as RE9’s most vertically complex environment, with players navigating between damaged floors of skyscrapers while uncovering corporate conspiracy evidence.

Raccoon City Park

The park areas, including the cemetery featured in RE3, would showcase how nature responds to massive devastation. Rather than simply dying, plant life often grows in strange and unpredictable ways in blast-damaged environments.

Expect to encounter:

• Mutated vegetation that grew in chemically altered soil over thirty years
• The cemetery with disturbed graves and weathered monuments
• Playground equipment now twisted and overgrown, creating haunting imagery
• The statue area where iconic RE3 moments occurred, now serving as landmarks in the wasteland

These areas could provide some of RE9’s most atmospheric moments, combining natural beauty with devastation in ways that emphasize the tragedy of what was lost.

The Psychological Landscape

Beyond physical destruction, returning to Raccoon City after thirty years creates unique psychological horror opportunities. This isn’t just about showing ruined buildings – it’s about confronting the weight of history and tragedy.

For Grace, walking through these ruins means:

• Connecting with her mother’s experiences during the original outbreak
• Understanding the scale of the cover-up that claimed over 100,000 lives
• Witnessing the long-term consequences of bioweapons research
• Realizing the ongoing threat that led to her mother’s murder

The ruins themselves become characters in the story, silent witnesses to decades of secrets and lies.

What Survived, What Didn’t

Nakanishi’s comments about thoughtful destruction suggest RE9 won’t show uniform devastation. Some areas near the blast center would be completely obliterated, while others might be surprisingly intact. This selective preservation allows for strategic storytelling – important locations survive just enough to serve narrative purposes while showing realistic damage.

The developers’ approach balances:

• Believable destruction based on thermobaric blast patterns
• Iconic recognition so players can identify familiar locations
• Gameplay functionality ensuring areas remain navigable and interesting
• Emotional impact emphasizing the tragedy while maintaining hope

The Living City

Perhaps most importantly, RE9’s Raccoon City won’t be truly dead. Thirty years have allowed new forms of life to emerge in the devastated environment. Whether these are natural adaptations, remaining bioweapons, or something entirely new, the city pulses with different kinds of life than it once knew.

The ruins await not as a graveyard, but as a transformed ecosystem where humanity’s greatest mistake has evolved into something both beautiful and terrifying. Grace’s journey through these streets won’t just uncover her mother’s secrets – it will reveal what grows in the shadow of governmental devastation.

After thirty years of silence, Raccoon City is ready to tell its final stories.

As Resident Evil 9 Requiem approaches its February 2026 release, a persistent rumor has taken hold in the gaming community: that this ninth mainline entry will somehow serve as an “end of an era” for the franchise. This speculation has gained traction among fans eager for dramatic conclusions and nostalgic farewells, fueled by unverified leaker claims and wishful thinking from longtime series followers. But what does this theory actually claim, and does it hold any water?

The truth is more nuanced than either blind acceptance or outright dismissal. While the source of these claims remains unverified and often unreliable, the underlying concept isn’t as far-fetched as it might initially appear – if we understand what “end of an era” actually means. The distinction between ending a narrative arc and ending an entire franchise is crucial, yet often overlooked in discussions about RE9’s potential significance.

The speculation has divided the Resident Evil community between those who desperately want closure to decades-old storylines and those who fear any suggestion of finality might threaten their favorite franchise’s future. Both camps may be missing the bigger picture: that evolution and conclusion aren’t mutually exclusive concepts in successful long-running series.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

What Does “End of an Era” Actually Mean?

Critics often assume “end of an era” means “end of the franchise” – but these are entirely different concepts. Understanding this distinction is crucial to properly evaluating the speculation and avoiding knee-jerk reactions to what might actually be reasonable creative planning.

“End of an era” could very reasonably refer to several distinct narrative conclusions:

The Raccoon City Storyline Arc: After 30+ years, RE9 might finally conclude the mysteries surrounding the original outbreak, the government cover-up, and the lingering conspiracies that began in 1998. Grace Ashcroft’s investigation into her mother’s death provides the perfect vehicle for resolving these decades-old questions definitively.

The Traditional Bioweapons Narrative: The T-virus, G-virus, and related bioweapons research could reach their narrative conclusion, making way for entirely new types of threats. The series has explored virtually every angle of corporate bioweapons development, from Umbrella to The Connections to government programs.

The Umbrella Legacy: The ripple effects of Umbrella Corporation’s actions – from The Connections to government conspiracies to survivor exploitation – might finally be resolved. These threads have dominated the series for three decades and risk becoming repetitive without resolution.

Classic Character Arcs: Long-running storylines involving Leon, Claire, Chris, and other legacy characters could reach natural endpoints. Rather than continuing indefinitely, their stories might achieve satisfying conclusions that honor their contributions while making room for new protagonists.

The Virus-Centric Horror Model: Resident Evil could move beyond biological threats entirely, exploring supernatural, technological, or psychological horror that doesn’t rely on corporate malfeasance and viral outbreaks.

This interpretation makes the theory far more plausible and even sensible from a creative standpoint. It suggests strategic narrative planning rather than franchise termination.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category — from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Why This Version Makes Business Sense

Rather than killing the franchise, concluding the Raccoon City era could be brilliant business strategy. After three decades of bioweapons plots and Umbrella-related conspiracies, the narrative threads risk becoming repetitive or convoluted. Wrapping up these storylines would clear the deck for fresh concepts that could attract new audiences while satisfying longtime fans.

Consider what Resident Evil could become post-“era”:

• Technological Horror: AI, cybernetics, and digital nightmares reflecting modern anxieties about technology’s role in society
• Environmental Horror: Climate disasters and ecological collapse, addressing contemporary fears about environmental destruction
• Psychological Horror: Pure mental trauma without bioweapons, focusing on human psychology and social breakdown

The franchise’s strength lies in its flexibility to reinvent itself while maintaining core survival horror identity. Concluding old storylines isn’t limitation – it’s liberation from narrative constraints that have defined the series for decades.

Capcom has demonstrated this adaptability throughout the series’ history. The transition from fixed camera angles to over-the-shoulder action, then to first-person horror, proves the franchise can evolve dramatically while retaining its essential character. Concluding the bioweapons era would simply represent another evolution.

The Evidence in RE9’s Design

Several elements of RE9 support the “narrative conclusion” interpretation, suggesting deliberate planning rather than coincidental timing:

Grace’s Role as Bridge Character: As Alyssa Ashcroft’s daughter, Grace represents both legacy connection and new generation. Her story could serve as transition between old mysteries and future possibilities, providing closure to Outbreak-era storylines while establishing new directions for the franchise.

Return to Raccoon City: Rather than nostalgic fan service, this could be the final examination of the incident that started everything. Uncovering the “hidden truth” might provide definitive closure to 30 years of conspiracy, answering questions that have lingered since the original game.

The “Requiem” Title: A requiem is a funeral mass – commemoration of the dead while allowing the living to move forward. This suggests honoring the past while preparing for new directions, not ending everything but transitioning respectfully.

New Protagonist Focus: Centering the story on Grace rather than legacy characters indicates shift toward future rather than past. She represents what Resident Evil protagonists could become in a post-bioweapons world.

Timeline Significance: Setting the game 30 years after Raccoon City provides natural narrative distance for reflection and conclusion. It’s long enough for consequences to fully develop but recent enough for emotional impact.

The Business Reality Check

From a commercial perspective, concluding story arcs doesn’t threaten franchise longevity – it ensures it. Capcom has explicitly confirmed more remakes are coming, demonstrating commitment to the franchise’s future. The company could easily continue Resident Evil indefinitely with new threats, new characters, and new time periods.

The recent success of RE4 remake, Village, and the RE2/RE3 remakes proves both classic and modern approaches remain commercially viable. Village alone sold over 10 million copies, while the remakes consistently topped sales charts. Capcom has every incentive to evolve rather than conclude.

The franchise generates revenue through multiple streams: new games, remakes, merchandise, movies, and streaming series. Concluding the bioweapons narrative wouldn’t affect most of these revenue sources and might actually enhance them by providing clear creative direction.

The Nostalgia vs. Innovation Balance

The “end of an era” theory appeals to fans’ desire for closure while addressing creative necessity. After nearly three decades, some storylines have reached natural completion points. Continuing them indefinitely risks diminishing returns and narrative fatigue that could damage the franchise’s reputation.

Grace Ashcroft’s investigation into her mother’s death provides perfect opportunity to resolve lingering Raccoon City mysteries while establishing new directions. Her character development from vulnerable analyst to capable survivor could serve as template for future protagonists in different contexts.

The series has always balanced nostalgia with innovation. RE7 honored classic horror while introducing new characters and first-person perspective. Village combined classic monsters with new mythology. RE9 could achieve similar balance by concluding old stories while establishing new foundations.

The Fan Community Perspective

The Resident Evil community remains divided on the “end of an era” theory, reflecting broader tensions between preservation and progress. Some fans desperately want closure to storylines they’ve followed for decades, while others fear any change might diminish what they love about the series.

Both perspectives have merit. Long-term fans have emotional investment in characters and plotlines spanning decades. Their desire for satisfying conclusions is understandable and valid. Simultaneously, newer fans might prefer fresh starts without extensive backstory requirements.

The “end of an era” approach could satisfy both groups by providing closure for invested fans while creating accessible entry points for newcomers. Future games wouldn’t require knowledge of Umbrella’s history or Raccoon City’s significance.

The Verdict: Plausible But Unconfirmed

While the source of the “end of an era” speculation remains unverified, the underlying concept has merit when properly understood. Concluding the Raccoon City/bioweapons narrative arc while continuing the franchise makes both creative and business sense.

RE9 could very well represent the final chapter of Umbrella’s legacy and the last word on Raccoon City’s mysteries. This wouldn’t kill Resident Evil – it would free the series to explore entirely new forms of horror and storytelling while honoring its rich history.

However, without official confirmation from Capcom, this remains speculation regardless of its logical appeal. The company has given no indication that RE9 serves any special concluding function beyond being another entry in the series. Director Koshi Nakanishi has spoken about returning to survival horror roots, not concluding storylines.

Fans hoping for definitive closure to decades-old storylines may find themselves satisfied. Those expecting business-as-usual continuation of familiar themes might be surprised by new directions. Either way, the “end of an era” theory deserves more nuanced consideration than simple dismissal.

The only certainty is that come February 2026, we’ll discover whether RE9 concludes old stories or simply continues them. Until then, the speculation continues – grounded in reasonable creative logic even if the sources remain questionable. The theory’s plausibility doesn’t guarantee its accuracy, but it shouldn’t be dismissed without proper consideration of what “ending an era” might actually mean for the franchise’s future.