Author: Harvey

As Resident Evil 9 Requiem approaches, a compelling debate emerges within the gaming community: should beloved legacy characters face permanent endings, or should they be preserved indefinitely? The Last of Us Part II’s controversial decision to kill Joel Miller provides a fascinating case study in both the risks and potential rewards of eliminating fan-favorite protagonists. With RE9’s return to Raccoon City potentially serving as a culmination of decades-old storylines, the question becomes increasingly relevant: what should Capcom do with characters like Leon Kennedy, Claire Redfield, and other franchise veterans?

The answer isn’t as straightforward as it might seem. Both preservation and elimination carry compelling arguments that reveal fundamental tensions between artistic integrity, fan service, and commercial viability.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Case for Character Deaths: Artistic Integrity and Emotional Impact

Narrative Authenticity: After 30+ years of bioweapons incidents, government conspiracies, and impossible survival scenarios, the idea that every main character continues to survive strains credibility. Real people die in dangerous situations – even skilled, experienced people. Allowing characters to face permanent consequences would add weight and realism to RE9’s horror elements.

Emotional Stakes: When players know that beloved characters are essentially immortal due to plot armor, tension diminishes significantly. Joel’s death in The Last of Us Part II, while controversial, created genuine emotional impact precisely because players didn’t expect it. RE9 could achieve similar emotional resonance by putting legacy characters at real risk.

Character Arc Completion: Some storylines naturally reach endpoints that death could serve meaningfully. Leon’s journey from rookie cop to government agent could conclude with a heroic sacrifice that defines his legacy. Claire’s investigative work could lead her into danger that finally proves fatal. These deaths could provide satisfying narrative closure rather than indefinite continuation.

Generational Transition: Grace Ashcroft represents a new generation of protagonists. Having her mentor figures die – possibly while protecting her or helping her investigation -would complete the symbolic passing of the torch from old guard to new. This transition could feel more impactful than simply having older characters retire or disappear.

Creative Freedom: Preserving characters indefinitely limits storytelling options. Writers must constantly find new ways to challenge characters without permanently harming them, leading to increasingly contrived scenarios. Character deaths free future narratives from these constraints.

The Last of Us Part II’s Success: Despite controversy, TLOU2 won numerous awards, sold over 10 million copies, and is considered by many critics to be a masterpiece. Joel’s death, while painful for fans, served the story’s themes about cycles of violence and the costs of survival. Some argue the backlash came from players who couldn’t accept that their personal attachment to Joel wasn’t more important than the story being told.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category – from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

The Case Against Character Deaths: Fan Investment and Franchise Value

Fan Attachment Investment: Players have spent decades building emotional connections to these characters. Killing them feels like betraying that investment, particularly when fans have supported the franchise through multiple entries specifically because of these relationships.

The Last of Us Part II Backlash: While the game achieved critical success, the fan division was genuine and lasting. Many players felt manipulated and abandoned the franchise entirely. Social media remains filled with negative reactions years later, suggesting the damage was more significant than sales figures indicate.

Commercial Considerations: Leon Kennedy’s face sells games, merchandise, and movie tickets. Dead characters can’t anchor marketing campaigns or generate excitement for future releases. From a business perspective, killing valuable assets seems counterproductive.

Capcom’s Historical Pattern: The company has successfully avoided major character deaths for decades while maintaining franchise popularity. This suggests their current approach works and doesn’t require dramatic changes.

Alternative Drama Sources: RE9 can generate emotional stakes through other means – conspiracy revelations, monster encounters, environmental storytelling, and Grace’s personal journey. Character deaths aren’t necessary for effective horror or compelling drama.

The Daryl Dixon Phenomenon: Some characters become so beloved that killing them risks catastrophic fan backlash. Leon Kennedy has arguably achieved this status, where his death would overshadow any narrative benefits.

The Middle Ground: Risk Without Permanent Loss

Perhaps the most sophisticated approach involves putting characters in genuine danger without necessarily killing them:

Serious Consequences: Characters could face permanent injuries, trauma, or other lasting effects that change them without ending their stories entirely.

Temporary Deaths: Characters could appear to die but return later, providing emotional impact while preserving long-term value.

Retirement Endings: Legacy characters could step back from active bioweapons fighting, concluding their action-hero phases while remaining alive for potential future appearances.

Symbolic Deaths: Characters could “die” metaphorically – their old selves ending while new versions emerge, transformed by RE9’s events.

Genre Expectations and Horror Traditions

Horror games occupy unique narrative space regarding character mortality. Traditional horror often requires sacrifice and loss to achieve emotional impact, but video game horror operates differently:

Player Agency: Game protagonists succeed or fail based on player skill. Having characters die regardless of player performance can feel unfair or manipulative.

Franchise Continuity: Unlike standalone horror films, game franchises must balance individual story needs with long-term series considerations.

Commercial Realities: Horror films can kill protagonists because each entry stands alone. Game franchises risk damaging their most valuable assets.

Learning from Industry Examples

Game of Thrones: The TV series’ willingness to kill major characters initially strengthened storytelling but eventually contributed to fan alienation when deaths felt arbitrary rather than meaningful.

Marvel Cinematic Universe: Despite constant peril, most major characters survive because their commercial value outweighs narrative convenience. When deaths do occur (Iron Man, Black Widow), they serve clear story purposes and feel like natural conclusions.

The Walking Dead: The show’s frequent character deaths maintained tension but also led to viewer fatigue and declining ratings as fans became reluctant to invest in new characters.

The Stakes for RE9

The decision about legacy character mortality in RE9 carries implications beyond the game itself:

Franchise Future: How RE9 handles beloved characters will influence fan expectations for future entries and remakes.

Industry Precedent: Other franchises are watching to see whether The Last of Us Part II’s approach becomes a template or cautionary tale.

Fan Trust: Capcom’s relationship with longtime fans could be strengthened or damaged based on these choices.

What Seems Most Likely

Based on Capcom’s history, industry trends, and fan reactions to similar decisions elsewhere, RE9 will probably avoid killing major legacy characters. The company has demonstrated consistent risk aversion regarding beloved characters, and the mixed reception of The Last of Us Part II provides a clear warning about potential backlash.

However, the possibility remains that Capcom could surprise everyone. If the company believes RE9 represents a natural conclusion to certain character arcs, and if those deaths serve compelling narrative purposes, they might risk fan anger for artistic integrity.

The Fundamental Question

Ultimately, the debate reveals a fundamental tension in modern entertainment: should creators prioritize artistic vision or fan satisfaction? Should stories serve their own internal logic or preserve elements that audiences love?

The Last of Us Part II argued for artistic integrity over fan comfort. Resident Evil has traditionally chosen fan satisfaction over dramatic risk. RE9 will reveal which philosophy Capcom believes serves the franchise better.

Both approaches have merit. Both carry risks. The gaming industry will learn valuable lessons regardless of which path Capcom chooses – assuming they have the courage to make a definitive choice rather than playing it safe with preservation by default.

The conversation itself might be more valuable than the answer.

On October 1st, 1998, the United States government made an unprecedented decision: deploy an experimental thermobaric missile to completely destroy Raccoon City and contain the T-virus outbreak. For nearly three decades, the ruins have remained largely untouched, a devastated testament to one of the most catastrophic bioweapons incidents in history. Now, as Resident Evil 9 Requiem prepares to take us back to those haunted streets, the question isn’t whether we’ll recognize the city – it’s what horrors have grown in the shadow of thermobaric devastation.

Director Koshi Nakanishi has been remarkably candid about his approach to recreating post-apocalyptic Raccoon City. “We did essentially start with the existing design and layout of Raccoon City as has been seen most recently in Resident Evil 2 and 3 remakes,” he explained during a Games Radar interview at Gamescom 2025. “We thought it through. We were like, ‘Okay, well, this is where the bomb landed in the city. Then this would be the blast zone and the shock wave would maybe travel into these areas and that’s how they’d be affected.’”

This methodical approach to destruction suggests we’re not just getting generic ruins – we’re getting a scientifically considered vision of how thermobaric devastation would specifically affect Raccoon City’s most iconic locations.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Raccoon Police Department

Perhaps no location in Resident Evil history is more iconic than the RPD building, and Capcom has already confirmed its return in RE9’s marketing materials. The building’s unique architecture – originally designed as an art museum before being converted to police headquarters – presents fascinating questions about post-missile survival.

The RPD’s solid stone construction and underground passages suggest it might be among the most intact structures in the city. Museums are built to last, with thick walls designed to protect valuable artifacts. However, thirty years of neglect would have taken their toll in ways that zombies never could.

Expect to see:

• Collapsed sections where structural integrity finally failed after decades without maintenance
• Overgrown interiors as nature reclaims the building through broken windows and damaged roofing
• Flooded basement levels from decades of accumulated groundwater and damaged plumbing
• The famous main hall potentially still recognizable but dramatically weathered

The RPD’s underground passages and jail cells might have provided some protection from the initial blast, creating pockets of preserved evidence about the outbreak’s final hours. These areas could hold crucial clues about the “hidden truth” Grace seeks to uncover.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category — from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Raccoon General Hospital

The hospital where much of RE3’s action took place would likely present some of the most disturbing imagery in post-blast Raccoon City. Medical facilities contain equipment and chemicals that could create uniquely horrifying decay scenarios.

After thirty years, the hospital might feature:

• Contaminated medical waste still scattered throughout corridors, now fused with blast debris
• Collapsed operating theaters where surgical equipment has become twisted metal sculptures
• The clock tower (if RE9 includes this fan-favorite location) potentially still standing as a landmark but structurally unsound
• Underground morgue areas that might have preserved evidence of the outbreak’s final victims

The combination of medical horror imagery with missile devastation could create some of RE9’s most psychologically unsettling environments. Imagine IV drips and heart monitors now overgrown with mutated vegetation.

Kite Bros Railway: The Underground Network

Raccoon City’s underground train system represents one of the most intriguing post-blast environments. Underground structures often survive surface devastation better than buildings, but they present unique challenges after decades of abandonment.

The railway tunnels could feature:

• Flooded sections creating underground lakes in former train platforms
• Collapsed tunnel segments blocking traditional routes and creating new pathways
• The train cars themselves potentially preserved in some areas, rusted wrecks in others
• Emergency bunkers that might have sheltered survivors during the initial blast

These underground areas could serve crucial gameplay functions, providing protected routes through the city while harboring their own unique dangers. The darkness and confined spaces would amplify RE9’s horror elements while offering refuge from whatever threats roam the surface.

Spencer Mansion Region

While the Spencer Mansion itself was destroyed in the original Resident Evil, its location in the Arklay Mountains northwest of Raccoon City means the area might have escaped the worst blast effects. This region could serve as a bridge between RE9’s Raccoon City exploration and the broader Arklay Mountains lore.

Thirty years later, this area might feature:

• The mansion’s foundation still visible among overgrown forest
• Underground lab entrances sealed but potentially accessible
• The helipad area where Chris and Jill made their escape
• Umbrella research outposts that were abandoned but not destroyed

This region could provide context for how the T-virus outbreak began while showing how nature has reclaimed Umbrella’s experimental sites. The contrast between missile devastation in the city and natural overgrowth in the mountains could create striking visual storytelling.

Raccoon University

The university where the Daylight vaccine was developed represents crucial location for RE9’s plot. As the source of the cure that gave outbreak survivors their valuable antibodies, the university could hold vital information about the conspiracy Grace is investigating.

After three decades, the campus might feature:

• The chemistry building where Dr. Jenkins developed Daylight, potentially still containing research materials
• Lecture halls filled with debris but possibly preserving academic records
• Student dormitories creating maze-like environments through collapsed floors and walls
• The library where important documents might have survived in protected storage

The university’s significance to the Daylight vaccine subplot makes it a likely location for major story revelations. Hidden research about survivor antibodies could explain why Grace and her mother were targeted.

The Business District

Raccoon City’s downtown area, including Umbrella’s local offices and other corporate buildings, would present a unique vision of capitalism meeting thermobaric apocalypse. High-rise buildings would have suffered severe structural damage, creating a urban canyon landscape.

This area could include:

• Umbrella’s Raccoon City headquarters reduced to a skeletal frame but potentially containing archived research
• The mayor’s office where corruption and cover-up decisions were made
• Corporate lobbies now filled with debris but possibly preserving important documentation
• Rooftop areas offering vantage points across the ruined city

The business district could serve as RE9’s most vertically complex environment, with players navigating between damaged floors of skyscrapers while uncovering corporate conspiracy evidence.

Raccoon City Park

The park areas, including the cemetery featured in RE3, would showcase how nature responds to massive devastation. Rather than simply dying, plant life often grows in strange and unpredictable ways in blast-damaged environments.

Expect to encounter:

• Mutated vegetation that grew in chemically altered soil over thirty years
• The cemetery with disturbed graves and weathered monuments
• Playground equipment now twisted and overgrown, creating haunting imagery
• The statue area where iconic RE3 moments occurred, now serving as landmarks in the wasteland

These areas could provide some of RE9’s most atmospheric moments, combining natural beauty with devastation in ways that emphasize the tragedy of what was lost.

The Psychological Landscape

Beyond physical destruction, returning to Raccoon City after thirty years creates unique psychological horror opportunities. This isn’t just about showing ruined buildings – it’s about confronting the weight of history and tragedy.

For Grace, walking through these ruins means:

• Connecting with her mother’s experiences during the original outbreak
• Understanding the scale of the cover-up that claimed over 100,000 lives
• Witnessing the long-term consequences of bioweapons research
• Realizing the ongoing threat that led to her mother’s murder

The ruins themselves become characters in the story, silent witnesses to decades of secrets and lies.

What Survived, What Didn’t

Nakanishi’s comments about thoughtful destruction suggest RE9 won’t show uniform devastation. Some areas near the blast center would be completely obliterated, while others might be surprisingly intact. This selective preservation allows for strategic storytelling – important locations survive just enough to serve narrative purposes while showing realistic damage.

The developers’ approach balances:

• Believable destruction based on thermobaric blast patterns
• Iconic recognition so players can identify familiar locations
• Gameplay functionality ensuring areas remain navigable and interesting
• Emotional impact emphasizing the tragedy while maintaining hope

The Living City

Perhaps most importantly, RE9’s Raccoon City won’t be truly dead. Thirty years have allowed new forms of life to emerge in the devastated environment. Whether these are natural adaptations, remaining bioweapons, or something entirely new, the city pulses with different kinds of life than it once knew.

The ruins await not as a graveyard, but as a transformed ecosystem where humanity’s greatest mistake has evolved into something both beautiful and terrifying. Grace’s journey through these streets won’t just uncover her mother’s secrets – it will reveal what grows in the shadow of governmental devastation.

After thirty years of silence, Raccoon City is ready to tell its final stories.

As Resident Evil 9 Requiem approaches its February 2026 release, a persistent rumor has taken hold in the gaming community: that this ninth mainline entry will somehow serve as an “end of an era” for the franchise. This speculation has gained traction among fans eager for dramatic conclusions and nostalgic farewells, fueled by unverified leaker claims and wishful thinking from longtime series followers. But what does this theory actually claim, and does it hold any water?

The truth is more nuanced than either blind acceptance or outright dismissal. While the source of these claims remains unverified and often unreliable, the underlying concept isn’t as far-fetched as it might initially appear – if we understand what “end of an era” actually means. The distinction between ending a narrative arc and ending an entire franchise is crucial, yet often overlooked in discussions about RE9’s potential significance.

The speculation has divided the Resident Evil community between those who desperately want closure to decades-old storylines and those who fear any suggestion of finality might threaten their favorite franchise’s future. Both camps may be missing the bigger picture: that evolution and conclusion aren’t mutually exclusive concepts in successful long-running series.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

What Does “End of an Era” Actually Mean?

Critics often assume “end of an era” means “end of the franchise” – but these are entirely different concepts. Understanding this distinction is crucial to properly evaluating the speculation and avoiding knee-jerk reactions to what might actually be reasonable creative planning.

“End of an era” could very reasonably refer to several distinct narrative conclusions:

The Raccoon City Storyline Arc: After 30+ years, RE9 might finally conclude the mysteries surrounding the original outbreak, the government cover-up, and the lingering conspiracies that began in 1998. Grace Ashcroft’s investigation into her mother’s death provides the perfect vehicle for resolving these decades-old questions definitively.

The Traditional Bioweapons Narrative: The T-virus, G-virus, and related bioweapons research could reach their narrative conclusion, making way for entirely new types of threats. The series has explored virtually every angle of corporate bioweapons development, from Umbrella to The Connections to government programs.

The Umbrella Legacy: The ripple effects of Umbrella Corporation’s actions – from The Connections to government conspiracies to survivor exploitation – might finally be resolved. These threads have dominated the series for three decades and risk becoming repetitive without resolution.

Classic Character Arcs: Long-running storylines involving Leon, Claire, Chris, and other legacy characters could reach natural endpoints. Rather than continuing indefinitely, their stories might achieve satisfying conclusions that honor their contributions while making room for new protagonists.

The Virus-Centric Horror Model: Resident Evil could move beyond biological threats entirely, exploring supernatural, technological, or psychological horror that doesn’t rely on corporate malfeasance and viral outbreaks.

This interpretation makes the theory far more plausible and even sensible from a creative standpoint. It suggests strategic narrative planning rather than franchise termination.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category — from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Why This Version Makes Business Sense

Rather than killing the franchise, concluding the Raccoon City era could be brilliant business strategy. After three decades of bioweapons plots and Umbrella-related conspiracies, the narrative threads risk becoming repetitive or convoluted. Wrapping up these storylines would clear the deck for fresh concepts that could attract new audiences while satisfying longtime fans.

Consider what Resident Evil could become post-“era”:

• Technological Horror: AI, cybernetics, and digital nightmares reflecting modern anxieties about technology’s role in society
• Environmental Horror: Climate disasters and ecological collapse, addressing contemporary fears about environmental destruction
• Psychological Horror: Pure mental trauma without bioweapons, focusing on human psychology and social breakdown

The franchise’s strength lies in its flexibility to reinvent itself while maintaining core survival horror identity. Concluding old storylines isn’t limitation – it’s liberation from narrative constraints that have defined the series for decades.

Capcom has demonstrated this adaptability throughout the series’ history. The transition from fixed camera angles to over-the-shoulder action, then to first-person horror, proves the franchise can evolve dramatically while retaining its essential character. Concluding the bioweapons era would simply represent another evolution.

The Evidence in RE9’s Design

Several elements of RE9 support the “narrative conclusion” interpretation, suggesting deliberate planning rather than coincidental timing:

Grace’s Role as Bridge Character: As Alyssa Ashcroft’s daughter, Grace represents both legacy connection and new generation. Her story could serve as transition between old mysteries and future possibilities, providing closure to Outbreak-era storylines while establishing new directions for the franchise.

Return to Raccoon City: Rather than nostalgic fan service, this could be the final examination of the incident that started everything. Uncovering the “hidden truth” might provide definitive closure to 30 years of conspiracy, answering questions that have lingered since the original game.

The “Requiem” Title: A requiem is a funeral mass – commemoration of the dead while allowing the living to move forward. This suggests honoring the past while preparing for new directions, not ending everything but transitioning respectfully.

New Protagonist Focus: Centering the story on Grace rather than legacy characters indicates shift toward future rather than past. She represents what Resident Evil protagonists could become in a post-bioweapons world.

Timeline Significance: Setting the game 30 years after Raccoon City provides natural narrative distance for reflection and conclusion. It’s long enough for consequences to fully develop but recent enough for emotional impact.

The Business Reality Check

From a commercial perspective, concluding story arcs doesn’t threaten franchise longevity – it ensures it. Capcom has explicitly confirmed more remakes are coming, demonstrating commitment to the franchise’s future. The company could easily continue Resident Evil indefinitely with new threats, new characters, and new time periods.

The recent success of RE4 remake, Village, and the RE2/RE3 remakes proves both classic and modern approaches remain commercially viable. Village alone sold over 10 million copies, while the remakes consistently topped sales charts. Capcom has every incentive to evolve rather than conclude.

The franchise generates revenue through multiple streams: new games, remakes, merchandise, movies, and streaming series. Concluding the bioweapons narrative wouldn’t affect most of these revenue sources and might actually enhance them by providing clear creative direction.

The Nostalgia vs. Innovation Balance

The “end of an era” theory appeals to fans’ desire for closure while addressing creative necessity. After nearly three decades, some storylines have reached natural completion points. Continuing them indefinitely risks diminishing returns and narrative fatigue that could damage the franchise’s reputation.

Grace Ashcroft’s investigation into her mother’s death provides perfect opportunity to resolve lingering Raccoon City mysteries while establishing new directions. Her character development from vulnerable analyst to capable survivor could serve as template for future protagonists in different contexts.

The series has always balanced nostalgia with innovation. RE7 honored classic horror while introducing new characters and first-person perspective. Village combined classic monsters with new mythology. RE9 could achieve similar balance by concluding old stories while establishing new foundations.

The Fan Community Perspective

The Resident Evil community remains divided on the “end of an era” theory, reflecting broader tensions between preservation and progress. Some fans desperately want closure to storylines they’ve followed for decades, while others fear any change might diminish what they love about the series.

Both perspectives have merit. Long-term fans have emotional investment in characters and plotlines spanning decades. Their desire for satisfying conclusions is understandable and valid. Simultaneously, newer fans might prefer fresh starts without extensive backstory requirements.

The “end of an era” approach could satisfy both groups by providing closure for invested fans while creating accessible entry points for newcomers. Future games wouldn’t require knowledge of Umbrella’s history or Raccoon City’s significance.

The Verdict: Plausible But Unconfirmed

While the source of the “end of an era” speculation remains unverified, the underlying concept has merit when properly understood. Concluding the Raccoon City/bioweapons narrative arc while continuing the franchise makes both creative and business sense.

RE9 could very well represent the final chapter of Umbrella’s legacy and the last word on Raccoon City’s mysteries. This wouldn’t kill Resident Evil – it would free the series to explore entirely new forms of horror and storytelling while honoring its rich history.

However, without official confirmation from Capcom, this remains speculation regardless of its logical appeal. The company has given no indication that RE9 serves any special concluding function beyond being another entry in the series. Director Koshi Nakanishi has spoken about returning to survival horror roots, not concluding storylines.

Fans hoping for definitive closure to decades-old storylines may find themselves satisfied. Those expecting business-as-usual continuation of familiar themes might be surprised by new directions. Either way, the “end of an era” theory deserves more nuanced consideration than simple dismissal.

The only certainty is that come February 2026, we’ll discover whether RE9 concludes old stories or simply continues them. Until then, the speculation continues – grounded in reasonable creative logic even if the sources remain questionable. The theory’s plausibility doesn’t guarantee its accuracy, but it shouldn’t be dismissed without proper consideration of what “ending an era” might actually mean for the franchise’s future.

The Resident Evil community erupted when a seemingly innocuous livestream interview contained what might be the biggest RE9 spoiler yet. During a conversation with Biohazard France at Gamescom, director Koshi Nakanishi appeared to let slip that Resident Evil 9 would feature “characters from Raccoon City” – a statement that sent shockwaves through the fanbase before the video was mysteriously removed from public access.

Was this an accidental revelation of RE9’s biggest secret, or simply a mistranslation blown out of proportion? The evidence suggests something far more intriguing than a simple slip of the tongue.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Smoking Gun Interview

The controversy stems from a Biohazard France livestream featuring RE9 director Koshi Nakanishi and producer Masato Kumazawa discussing the upcoming game. During the interview, conducted primarily in Japanese, YouTube’s auto-generated translation reportedly captured Nakanishi saying something along the lines of “the story features characters from Raccoon City.”

What makes this particularly significant isn’t just the statement itself – it’s what happened afterward. The Biohazard France channel quickly removed or privatized the video, suggesting damage control over information that wasn’t supposed to be public. If the translation was simply incorrect or the statement innocuous, why the immediate takedown?

The removal speaks to the authenticity of the translation. Channels don’t typically scrub content unless it contains genuinely problematic information. The swift action suggests Capcom or Biohazard France recognized that sensitive information had been disclosed, whether intentionally or not.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category – from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

The Translation Question

YouTube’s auto-translation system is notoriously imperfect, particularly with Japanese-to-English conversion. However, the phrase “characters from Raccoon City” is relatively straightforward and doesn’t involve complex grammatical structures that typically confuse automated systems.

More importantly, if this were simply a translation error, the clarification would have been swift and public. Instead, we got video removal and silence—the kind of response reserved for genuine spoilers rather than misunderstandings.

The lack of official correction or clarification from Capcom further supports the authenticity of the translated statement. Companies are usually quick to debunk false information, especially when it generates significant community speculation.

Who Could “Characters from Raccoon City” Include?

If Nakanishi’s statement proves accurate, the pool of potential returning characters is surprisingly limited. The Raccoon City incident claimed over 100,000 lives, leaving only a handful of canonical survivors:

The Obvious Candidates:

• Leon S. Kennedy: The rookie cop turned government agent remains the series’ most popular character
• Claire Redfield: Chris’s sister and fellow RPD survivor with strong investigative instincts
• Jill Valentine: STARS member and bioweapons specialist (though she wasn’t technically in Raccoon City during the outbreak)
• Ada Wong: Spy with mysterious motivations and connections to bioweapons research
• Sherry Birkin: Now an adult government agent with unique viral immunity

The Dark Horse Options:

• Carlos Oliveira: Umbrella mercenary turned hero with military training
• Outbreak Survivors: Characters like Kevin Ryman, Mark Wilkins, or Yoko Suzuki from the online games

Chris Redfield is notably absent from fan speculation, despite being a core Raccoon City character from the STARS team. However, developers have confirmed that Chris is currently busy with BSAA operations elsewhere during RE9’s events, effectively ruling out his appearance in the game.

The Leon Factor

Fan speculation has overwhelmingly focused on Leon Kennedy, and for good reason. His popularity, government connections, and investigative experience make him a natural fit for RE9’s conspiracy-focused plot. The timing also works – Leon’s established relationship with the federal government could provide logical justification for his involvement in Grace’s FBI investigation.

Moreover, Leon represents the perfect bridge between RE9’s vulnerability-focused horror and the need for experienced guidance. He could serve as a mentor figure, helping Grace develop survival skills while respecting her role as the primary protagonist. This would satisfy fans demanding Leon’s return while maintaining RE9’s commitment to Grace’s character development.

The mysterious second voice in RE9’s reveal trailer – possibly voiced by Jeff Schine, who portrayed Carlos in RE3 remake – adds credence to Carlos speculation. If this voice belongs to the informant Alyssa was meeting before her murder, Carlos’s mercenary background and survival experience could explain his knowledge of dangerous conspiracies.

The Claire Connection

Claire Redfield presents another compelling possibility, particularly given her civilian investigative work and personal connection to bioweapons incidents. Unlike Leon’s government obligations, Claire operates independently, making her more likely to stumble onto conspiracies that official channels might want to suppress.

Claire’s experience with TerraSave and her history of investigating corporate malfeasance align perfectly with RE9’s themes. She represents the civilian investigative tradition that Alyssa Ashcroft embodied, making her a natural ally for Grace’s quest to uncover her mother’s work.

Additionally, Claire’s survival of Raccoon City gives her personal stakes in any conspiracy involving the incident’s aftermath. Her emotional investment in the truth could drive compelling character interactions with Grace.

The Outbreak Wildcard

Perhaps most intriguingly, Nakanishi also mentioned “characters from Outbreak and so on” in the same interview context. This suggests RE9 might delve deeper into the Outbreak games’ cast than just Alyssa Ashcroft’s legacy.

Characters like Kevin Ryman (RPD officer), Mark Wilkins (security guard), or Yoko Suzuki (university student) could provide unique perspectives on the conspiracy. Their civilian backgrounds and survival experiences mirror Grace’s situation while offering different skill sets and knowledge bases.

The Outbreak connection also reinforces the Daylight vaccine subplot. If other Outbreak survivors appear in RE9, it could confirm theories about systematic harvesting of survivor blood for bioweapons research. Multiple survivors gathering would create a larger target for whoever is hunting people with T-virus antibodies.

Why Now? The 30-Year Anniversary

The timing of potential legacy character returns aligns perfectly with RE9’s thematic focus on Raccoon City’s 30-year anniversary. Returning to the site of the original tragedy with surviving characters creates natural emotional resonance and narrative significance.

These characters would bring decades of experience fighting bioweapons conspiracies, providing context for RE9’s mystery while demonstrating how the incident’s effects continue to ripple through their lives. Their presence would transform Grace’s investigation from a personal quest into a continuation of a struggle that began three decades earlier.

The Marketing Strategy

From a business perspective, legacy character appearances make perfect sense. RE9 represents the franchise’s return to Raccoon City and survival horror roots—including beloved characters from that era completes the nostalgia package while attracting fans who might otherwise be hesitant about a new protagonist.

The “slip-up” itself might be intentional marketing, generating buzz and speculation while maintaining plausible deniability. Whether accidental or planned, the controversy has certainly succeeded in keeping RE9 in gaming conversations.

What the Evidence Suggests

The combination of the suspicious video removal, the lack of official correction, and the contextual logic of legacy character appearances strongly suggests Nakanishi’s statement might be accurate. RE9 likely does feature returning characters from Raccoon City, though their exact roles remain mysterious.

The question isn’t whether legacy characters will appear, but how they’ll be integrated into Grace’s story. Will they serve as protagonists, mentors, or supporting characters? Will they appear throughout the game or only in specific sequences?

Given RE9’s commitment to Grace as the primary protagonist and its horror-focused approach, legacy characters will likely serve supporting roles – providing guidance, exposition, and emotional weight without overshadowing the new lead.

The Final Verdict

If Director Koshi Nakanishi’s apparent slip-up proves accurate, it could represent more than just an accidental spoiler – it might be a promise that RE9 will honor the series’ legacy while forging new ground. The potential return of Raccoon City survivors would transform Grace’s investigation from an isolated mystery into the culmination of a three-decade-long struggle for truth.

Whether Leon, Claire, or other beloved characters ultimately appear remains to be seen, but their presence would provide both fan service and narrative significance. After thirty years, the survivors of Raccoon City might finally get the chance to expose the conspiracy that claimed their city – with Grace Ashcroft potentially carrying their torch into a new generation of bioweapons horror.

The alleged slip-up might have been accidental, but if true, the implications could be entirely intentional. RE9 may not just be revisiting Raccoon City’s ruins – it could be reuniting with the heroes who escaped its destruction.

When Resident Evil Village players first descended into the basement of House Beneviento, they encountered something unprecedented in the series: pure, weaponless terror. No guns, no grenades, no superhuman abilities – just a vulnerable protagonist armed with nothing but a flashlight and their wits. The sequence became legendary among horror fans, representing the series at its most psychologically terrifying.

Now, Director Koshi Nakanishi is taking those lessons and expanding them into an entire game philosophy for Resident Evil 9 Requiem. What worked for twenty minutes in Village’s most celebrated sequence becomes the foundation for RE9’s complete horror experience.

“There are similarities to that section for sure,” Nakanishi acknowledged during a Games Radar interview at Gamescom 2025. “I think each Resident Evil title has these sort of standalone parts where maybe you don’t have the weapons you’re used to and we can increase the horror feeling with that.”

But RE9 isn’t content to simply replicate House Beneviento’s success – it’s evolving those terror mechanics into something more sophisticated, more sustained, and potentially more terrifying than anything the series has attempted before.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The House Beneviento Blueprint

To understand RE9’s horror evolution, we must first examine what made House Beneviento so effective. The sequence stripped away everything that typically empowers Resident Evil protagonists:

Complete Vulnerability: Ethan enters with no weapons, no combat abilities, and no supernatural powers. His only advantages are mobility and problem-solving skills.

Environmental Storytelling: The horror emerges from exploration and discovery rather than jump scares or combat encounters. Players piece together the tragedy through environmental clues.

Psychological Terror: The threats are primarily mental rather than physical. The fear comes from anticipation, atmosphere, and the unknown rather than direct confrontation.

Puzzle-Focused Progression: Players advance by solving environmental puzzles that require careful observation and logical thinking, not reflexes or firepower.

Sustained Helplessness: The vulnerability never breaks. There’s no moment where players suddenly gain an advantage or feel empowered.

These elements combined to create what many consider the scariest sequence in Resident Evil history. The question for RE9 became: how do you expand this twenty-minute experience into a full game without losing its impact?

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category – from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

RE9’s Terror Amplification

RE9’s answer is sophisticated and multi-layered. Rather than simply extending House Beneviento’s approach, Nakanishi and his team have identified ways to enhance and evolve its core mechanics:

The Intelligent Stalker System

Where House Beneviento relied on atmospheric dread, RE9 introduces an active threat that combines the best elements of Mr. X, Nemesis, and Lady Dimitrescu with House Beneviento’s psychological approach. The stalker creature isn’t just a pursuing enemy – it’s an environmental hazard that fundamentally changes how players interact with the game world.

The creature’s sensitivity to light creates dynamic safe spaces that feel both protective and temporary. Unlike traditional safe rooms with arbitrary boundaries, RE9’s light-based sanctuary system provides logical, understandable protection while maintaining constant tension about light sources failing or being extinguished.

Destructible Hiding Spots

One of RE9’s most innovative terror mechanics involves destructible hiding places. When players hide under tables or behind objects, the stalker can destroy these hiding spots if it discovers them, permanently removing that option from the environment.

This creates escalating tension that House Beneviento never achieved. Each discovered hiding spot increases vulnerability for future encounters, forcing players to constantly adapt their survival strategies. The fear compounds over time as safe options disappear.

Grace’s Authentic Terror Responses

Unlike Ethan’s relatively stoic reactions, Grace Ashcroft displays authentic terror responses that amplify the horror experience. In third-person mode, players witness her stumbling, shaking, and flinching – physical manifestations of fear that create emotional resonance.

“She’s so scared when she’s running away from the creature,” Nakanishi explained. “But that doesn’t happen in first-person – making the camera move like that in first-person would be very unnatural, and possibly even uncomfortable!”

This dual-perspective approach allows players to choose their preferred level of immersion while maintaining the character’s authentic fear responses. The horror adapts to player preferences without compromising its effectiveness.

New Horror Innovations Beyond Beneviento

While building on House Beneviento’s foundation, RE9 introduces several entirely new terror mechanics:

Environmental Manipulation by Enemies

The stalker creature can throw furniture and objects at players, creating dynamic environmental hazards. This isn’t just cosmetic – it demonstrates intelligence and adaptability that makes the threat feel more real and unpredictable.

Light as Limited Resource

Unlike traditional horror games where flashlights have infinite batteries, RE9 treats illumination as a precious, finite resource. Players must carefully manage light sources while using them strategically to ward off threats. The constant awareness of dwindling light creates sustained anxiety.

Medical Horror Elements

Grace’s awakening on a medical gurney, complete with blood extraction and surgical bandages, introduces body horror elements that House Beneviento only hinted at. The violation of bodily autonomy adds visceral discomfort to psychological fear.

The Emotional Transference System

One of RE9’s most sophisticated horror innovations involves what Nakanishi calls “emotional transference” – using Grace’s visible reactions to amplify player fear through empathy.

“You can almost empathize with the character more when you see them on screen,” he explained. “It almost makes you panic, because you see her panicking.”

This represents a fundamental evolution from House Beneviento’s approach. While Donna Beneviento’s domain relied on environmental storytelling and atmospheric dread, RE9 uses character animation and performance to create horror through emotional connection.

The system works bidirectionally: Grace’s fear responses make players more afraid, while her gradual adaptation helps players feel their own growing competence. It’s a sophisticated feedback loop that maintains horror effectiveness throughout extended gameplay sessions.

Sustained Terror Without Exhaustion

House Beneviento’s greatest limitation was duration – its intensity couldn’t be maintained indefinitely without exhausting players. RE9 solves this through what Nakanishi describes as dynamic pacing curves with greater extremes than ever before.

“You can’t keep the horror tension to the max through the whole game because it’s quite exhausting,” he acknowledged. “So you need to have this kind of dynamic pacing curve where you’ll have a very tense horrific sequence and then we give you a bit of a release.”

RE9’s innovation lies in making these tension/release cycles more extreme. The horror sequences are more terrifying than House Beneviento, while the relief periods provide genuine respite without breaking immersion. Players get the full intensity experience without the fatigue that would normally result.

The Intelligence Factor

Perhaps RE9’s most significant evolution beyond House Beneviento involves intellectual engagement. Grace’s FBI analyst background provides justification for complex puzzle-solving and investigation mechanics that feel natural within the horror framework.

Unlike House Beneviento’s largely environmental puzzles, RE9’s challenges require active investigation, evidence gathering, and logical deduction. Players aren’t just solving mechanical puzzles – they’re conducting a criminal investigation while being hunted by supernatural threats.

This intellectual engagement serves multiple purposes: it provides agency during vulnerable moments, creates investment in the story beyond mere survival, and offers alternative progression paths for players who prefer thinking to reflexes.

Learning from Village’s Lessons

Nakanishi has been remarkably candid about learning from Resident Evil 7’s reception, noting that it was “possibly too scary” and that “some people couldn’t handle it.” This awareness shapes RE9’s approach to expanding House Beneviento’s terror mechanics.

The dual camera system specifically addresses this concern. Players who find the first-person experience overwhelming can switch to third-person for slight psychological distance without losing the horror experience entirely. It’s accessibility through design rather than dilution.

The Future of Survival Horror

RE9’s horror design represents more than just an evolution of House Beneviento – it suggests a new paradigm for survival horror that combines psychological terror with character development, environmental storytelling with active investigation, and sustained vulnerability with meaningful progression.

By taking Village’s most successful horror sequence and expanding it into a complete game philosophy, RE9 isn’t just building on past success – it’s defining what survival horror can become in the modern gaming landscape.

The house on the hill taught players to fear the unknown. Now Grace Ashcroft’s nightmare promises to teach them something far more unsettling: that sometimes, knowing the truth is even more terrifying than ignorance.

The evolution of fear continues, and it’s learning from its most successful teacher.

Sources

• Games Radar interview with Koshi Nakanishi at Gamescom 2025: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/resident-evil/resident-evil-9-requiem-interview-gamescom-2025/

• Games Radar horror design analysis: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/resident-evil/resident-evil-7-was-possibly-too-scary-and-some-people-couldnt-handle-it-says-director-koshi-nakanishi-and-thats-why-resident-evil-9-has-a-third-person-mode-to-make-it-slightly-easier-to-deal-with/

Grace Ashcroft represents a return to authentic vulnerability that the franchise hasn’t seen since its earliest entries, but with modern character depth that could redefine what a Resident Evil protagonist can be.

After nearly three decades of boulder-punching supersoldiers and mold-powered immortals, Resident Evil 9 Requiem is taking a bold step backward – and it might be the series’ smartest decision yet.

Director Koshi Nakanishi wasn’t exaggerating when he called Grace “a new type of character for the Resident Evil series.” She’s introverted, easily scared, and completely unprepared for the nightmare she’s thrust into. In an era where action heroes dominate gaming, Grace’s authentic fragility feels revolutionary.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

Brains Over Brawn

Grace’s background as an FBI intelligence analyst immediately sets her apart from previous protagonists. She’s not a special forces operative, a police officer, or a bioweapons specialist. She’s a desk analyst – someone who solves problems with data, patterns, and careful investigation rather than firepower and superhuman reflexes.

This professional background creates fascinating opportunities for gameplay and storytelling that the series has never fully explored. Grace approaches problems like an investigator, not a soldier. She’s trained to gather evidence, connect disparate pieces of information, and build comprehensive cases against criminal organizations. These skills translate perfectly to survival horror, where understanding your environment and enemies often matters more than shooting accuracy.

“She’s an FBI analyst, so she has undergone some weapons training in the course of becoming an agent,” Nakanishi explained in a Games Radar interview at Gamescom 2025. “While she’s not quite as competent with a handgun as some of the more heroic characters, she can handle herself ultimately a little bit better than Ethan, who really doesn’t have any background in that kind of stuff.”

This places Grace in a perfect sweet spot: competent enough to be believable in combat situations, but vulnerable enough to maintain genuine tension. She’s not helpless, but she’s not overpowered either.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category – from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Grace Ashcroft’s Vulnerability as Strength

What makes Grace truly special isn’t her training – it’s her humanity. When she wakes up strapped upside down to a medical table, her terror is palpable and authentic. Unlike seasoned protagonists who might quip or strategize in similar situations, Grace experiences genuine shock and fear.

“The start point for her is to be incredibly vulnerable and helpless,” Nakanishi revealed. “She hasn’t got any weapons on her and she’s completely unaccustomed to being thrown into this kind of intense situation.”

This vulnerability isn’t a weakness to be overcome – it’s the foundation of effective horror. Grace’s fear makes players feel fear. Her stumbling, panicked reactions in third-person mode create emotional resonance that stoic action heroes simply cannot achieve. When Grace trips while running from the stalker creature, players feel her desperation in a way that Leon’s perfectly executed knife parries never could.

The dual camera system showcases this beautifully. In third person, players witness Grace’s physical manifestations of terror – stumbling, shaking, flinching at every shadow. In first person, they experience that terror directly through her eyes. Both perspectives serve the horror experience by centering Grace’s authentic emotional responses.

The Personal Stakes Revolution

Previous Resident Evil protagonists were often motivated by duty, revenge, or circumstance. Grace’s motivation is deeply personal in a way that transforms the entire narrative framework. She’s not investigating bioweapons because it’s her job – she’s hunting for the truth about her mother’s murder.

This personal connection to the mystery creates storytelling opportunities that professional obligation cannot match. Every clue Grace uncovers about the conspiracy isn’t just plot advancement – it’s a revelation about her family history, her identity, and the forces that shaped her life. The investigation becomes a journey of self-discovery as much as a survival horror experience.

Her relationship with her deceased mother, Alyssa Ashcroft, adds layers of emotional complexity rarely seen in the series. Grace isn’t just fighting monsters – she’s following in her mother’s footsteps, uncovering the story Alyssa died trying to tell. This generational aspect creates thematic depth that extends far beyond simple monster encounters.

The Growth Arc

Perhaps most importantly, Grace represents the series’ most compelling character development opportunity. Her journey from terrified victim to capable survivor promises to be more emotionally satisfying than any previous protagonist transformation.

“She goes on a journey and you’ll go with her too,” Nakanishi explained. “She will grow throughout the game and gradually become more competent and capable and overcome her fear somewhat. She will naturally find weapons eventually and be able to grab guns and shoot back at the horrors that await her.”

This progression feels earned rather than assumed. When Grace finally picks up her mother’s handgun – likely as both weapon and memento – it will represent genuine character growth. Every combat encounter she survives, every puzzle she solves, every moment of terror she endures contributes to her evolution from victim to survivor.

Unlike protagonists who begin as competent action heroes, Grace’s victories feel meaningful because they’re hard-won. Her journey mirrors the player’s own learning curve, creating a bond between character and audience that professional soldiers or experienced agents rarely achieve.

Breaking the Action Hero Mold

Grace’s design philosophy directly challenges the series’ increasing reliance on action hero tropes. She can’t roundhouse kick zombies or perform impossible knife combat maneuvers. She can’t shrug off injuries that would hospitalize normal humans. She exists in a more grounded reality where survival requires wit, caution, and genuine resourcefulness.

This grounding serves the horror experience in ways that superhuman protagonists cannot. When Grace hides under a table from the stalker creature, it feels like a rational survival strategy. When she uses light sources to ward off enemies, it demonstrates creative problem-solving under pressure. Her limitations force players to think like survivors rather than action heroes.

The series has spent years escalating protagonist power levels to match increasingly spectacular threats. Grace represents a return to human-scale horror where the monsters are terrifying precisely because the protagonist is genuinely vulnerable to them.

The Emotional Intelligence Factor

Grace’s background as an analyst suggests emotional intelligence that most RE protagonists lack. She’s trained to understand motivations, recognize patterns in behavior, and build psychological profiles of criminal actors. These skills could revolutionize how players interact with RE9’s mystery elements.

Instead of simply fighting through obstacles, Grace might piece together enemy motivations, predict organizational behavior, or manipulate situations through understanding rather than force. Her analytical mind could provide unique solutions to problems that previous protagonists would solve through combat alone.

This intellectual approach to survival horror feels fresh and contemporary. Modern audiences appreciate protagonists who think their way through problems rather than shooting everything that moves. Grace’s analytical background provides natural justification for puzzle-solving gameplay while maintaining narrative consistency.

The Legacy Connection

Grace’s connection to Alyssa Ashcroft provides something the series has rarely attempted: genuine continuity between entries that enhances rather than constrains the new story. She’s not just another protagonist – she’s the daughter of a previous hero, carrying forward both genetic and emotional legacies.

This connection allows RE9 to honor the Outbreak games while telling an entirely new story. Grace doesn’t need extensive backstory exposition because her heritage provides context. Players familiar with Alyssa’s story gain deeper appreciation for Grace’s journey, while newcomers receive all necessary information through natural character development.

The generational aspect also adds weight to Grace’s investigation. She’s not just solving a case – she’s completing her mother’s work, honoring her sacrifice, and potentially preventing future tragedies. This emotional investment elevates every story beat beyond simple plot mechanics.

Why Grace Could Be the Best

Grace Ashcroft succeeds where other protagonists have faltered by embracing limitations rather than transcending them. She’s strong enough to be credible but vulnerable enough to be relatable. She’s smart enough to solve complex problems but inexperienced enough to face genuine danger. She’s motivated by personal stakes but professional enough to approach problems systematically.

Most importantly, Grace feels like a real person rather than an action movie archetype. Her fears, motivations, and reactions all stem from recognizably human responses to extraordinary circumstances. This authenticity creates emotional investment that superhuman protagonists cannot match.

In returning to the series’ survival horror roots, Capcom needed a protagonist who could carry that vision convincingly. Grace Ashcroft isn’t just perfect for RE9’s horror-focused approach – she might be exactly what the entire franchise needed to rediscover its identity.

After years of increasingly powerful heroes fighting increasingly spectacular threats, Grace represents a return to the fundamental truth of survival horror: the monsters are only scary if the protagonist is genuinely afraid of them. And Grace Ashcroft is very, very afraid.

That fear might just save the series.

After years of increasingly action-oriented entries, Resident Evil 9 Requiem is making a bold statement: pure survival horror is back. Director Koshi Nakanishi has been crystal clear about his vision for the upcoming title, explicitly comparing it to the horror-focused approaches of Resident Evil 7 and the RE2 remake rather than the more combat-heavy Village and RE4 remake.

But what does this really mean for players, and why is Capcom steering the franchise back toward its terrifying origins?

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Action Problem

The Resident Evil series has always walked a tightrope between action and horror, but recent entries tilted heavily toward the former. Village, while critically acclaimed, often felt more like a supernatural action-adventure than a horror experience. Players could accumulate massive arsenals, mow down enemies with ease, and rarely felt the resource scarcity that defined classic RE games.

Even the RE4 remake, despite its masterful execution, leaned into its action roots. Leon’s knife parrying system and abundant ammunition made players feel empowered rather than vulnerable—the exact opposite of what survival horror should achieve.

“If I had to compare it to past titles, it’s more along the lines of Resident Evil 7 or the Resident Evil 2 remake,” Nakanishi explained in a recent interview. “You could call it so-called old school Resident Evil, you know, with exploration and backtracking and that kind of thing.”

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category — from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

Grace: The Perfect Protagonist for Pure Horror

RE9’s return to horror starts with its protagonist. Grace Ashcroft isn’t a superhuman government agent or a mold-powered entity – she’s an FBI analyst thrown into a nightmare scenario she’s completely unprepared for.

“The start point for her is to be incredibly vulnerable and helpless,” Nakanishi revealed. “She hasn’t got any weapons on her and she’s completely unaccustomed to being thrown into this kind of intense situation.”

This vulnerability isn’t just narrative window dressing – it’s fundamental to the horror experience. Unlike Chris Redfield punching boulders or Leon performing superhuman knife combat, Grace represents genuine human fragility. Players will experience authentic terror because Grace herself is genuinely terrified.

The Gamescom demo perfectly exemplifies this approach. Grace wakes up strapped upside down in an unknown facility, with no weapons, no backup, and no idea where she is. She’s pursued by a towering creature that she can’t fight – only hide from or distract with light sources. It’s pure, distilled survival horror.

Learning from House Beneviento’s Success

Nakanishi isn’t shy about drawing inspiration from Village’s most celebrated sequence: the House Beneviento section. This weaponless, puzzle-focused segment was universally praised as the game’s scariest moment – precisely because it stripped away all player empowerment.

“There are similarities to that section for sure,” the director acknowledged. “I think each Resident Evil title has these sort of standalone parts where maybe you don’t have the weapons you’re used to and we can increase the horror feeling with that.”

But RE9 is taking this concept much further. Rather than relegating vulnerability to a single section, the entire game is built around Grace’s journey from helplessness to competence. Players will gradually find weapons and grow stronger, but the foundation remains rooted in fear rather than power fantasy.

The Return of Classic RE Elements

Beyond protagonist vulnerability, RE9 is bringing back several mechanics that defined classic Resident Evil:

Limited Inventory Space: Like RE7, players will face tough decisions about what items to carry, forcing strategic thinking over hoarding.

Resource Scarcity: Ammunition and healing items will be precious commodities, not abundant resources to be wasted.

Exploration and Backtracking: The interconnected world design rewards thorough exploration and requires players to revisit areas with new tools – a hallmark of classic RE design.

Puzzle-Focused Gameplay: Environmental puzzles take precedence over combat encounters, emphasizing brain over brawn.

Ink Ribbons: The return of save limitations adds tension to every decision and progress milestone.

Why the Shift Makes Perfect Sense

This horror renaissance isn’t just nostalgic pandering – it’s a smart business and creative decision. Resident Evil 7’s return to pure horror was both critically acclaimed and commercially successful, proving that audiences hunger for genuine scares. The RE2 remake similarly demonstrated that classic survival horror mechanics could work brilliantly with modern technology.

Moreover, Nakanishi understands that effective horror requires careful pacing. “You can’t keep the horror tension to the max through the whole game because it’s quite exhausting,” he explained. “So you need to have this kind of dynamic pacing curve.”

RE9 promises to perfect this balance, creating what the director describes as “a complete roller coaster ride between the different aspects of the series.”

The Dual Perspective Advantage

RE9’s innovative dual camera system also serves the horror mission. Players who find first-person too intense can switch to third-person for slight relief, while those seeking maximum immersion can stay locked in Grace’s terrified perspective.

“If you start the game off in first person perspective and you’re finding it’s too much, then third person is almost a way to step slightly back from that level of horror,” Nakanishi noted. This accessibility ensures that pure horror can reach a broader audience without compromising intensity for dedicated fans.

A Necessary Course Correction

RE9’s return to survival horror represents more than just a creative choice – it’s a necessary course correction for a franchise that had arguably strayed too far from its roots. While action-heavy entries have their place, the series’ identity lies in making players feel genuinely afraid and vulnerable.

By putting horror first, RE9 isn’t just returning to what made Resident Evil great – it’s potentially defining what the franchise can become in the modern gaming landscape. Grace’s journey from terrified victim to capable survivor promises to remind us why we fell in love with survival horror in the first place.

Sometimes, to move forward, you have to go back to what worked. For Resident Evil 9, that means embracing the darkness once again.

Sources:

GamesRadar+ Interview at Gamescom 2025: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/resident-evil/resident-evil-9-requiem-interview-gamescom-2025/

GamesRadar+ – “RE7 was possibly too scary”: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/resident-evil/resident-evil-7-was-possibly-too-scary-and-some-people-couldnt-handle-it-says-director-koshi-nakanishi-and-thats-why-resident-evil-9-has-a-third-person-mode-to-make-it-slightly-easier-to-deal-with/

GamesRadar+ – “Old School Resident Evil”: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/resident-evil/resident-evil-9-requiem-interview-gamescom-2025/

WCCFtech Coverage: https://wccftech.com/resident-evil-requiem-complete-rollercoaster-ride-never-before/

In the chaos of Raccoon City’s final hours, a miracle occurred that few remember and even fewer understand. Dr. Peter Jenkins at Raccoon University successfully developed a cure for the T-virus – a vaccine he named “Daylight.” This breakthrough could have changed the course of bioweapons history, yet it seemingly vanished into obscurity after the city’s nuclear destruction. But what if it didn’t disappear? What if the Daylight vaccine’s legacy lives on in the bloodstream of survivors – and their children?

Resident Evil 9 Requiem’s central mystery may hinge on this forgotten cure and its most precious carriers: second-generation survivors like Grace Ashcroft, whose blood could hold the key to either humanity’s salvation or its destruction.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you purchase through these links at no extra cost to you. This helps support my gaming content.

The Forgotten Vaccine of Raccoon University

While most survivors escaped Raccoon City through luck and determination, some had an ace up their sleeve: access to Dr. Jenkins’ revolutionary Daylight vaccine. This T-virus cure represented one of two possible salvation routes for survivors, alongside Umbrella researcher Linda Baldwin’s competing treatment.

Those fortunate enough to receive the Daylight vaccine didn’t just survive – they developed robust antibodies against T-virus infection. Their immune systems learned to recognize and neutralize the bioweapon that had claimed over 100,000 lives. Among these lucky survivors was investigative journalist Alyssa Ashcroft, who would carry these life-saving antibodies in her bloodstream for the rest of her life.

But here’s where the science gets interesting: antibodies don’t just protect the person who develops them. They can be passed from mother to child during pregnancy, creating what immunologists call “passive immunity.” Grace Ashcroft didn’t just inherit her mother’s investigative instincts – she inherited her mother’s biological defenses against the world’s most dangerous bioweapon.

🎮 What’s Hot in Video Games Right Now
See which games, consoles, and accessories are climbing fast in popularity. Updated hourly, this list spotlights the biggest jumps in sales rank across the entire Video Games category — from the latest releases to must-have gear. It’s the easiest way to discover what gamers everywhere are buying today.

👉 Check out the trending picks here

The Blood Harvest

The opening of RE9 shows Grace awakening on a medical gurney, blood being systematically extracted from her unconscious body. This isn’t random violence – it’s precision harvesting. Medical notes track the “extraction” process, suggesting her captors know exactly what they’re looking for: decades-old T-virus antibodies, now evolved and concentrated in second-generation blood.

Grace’s blood represents something unprecedented in bioweapons research. Unlike first-generation survivors whose antibodies developed through direct infection and cure, Grace carries naturally inherited immunity – antibodies that have had thirty years to mature and adapt within a healthy immune system. This makes her blood invaluable for multiple applications:

Bioweapons Development: Understanding how these antibodies work could help create new viruses designed to bypass natural immunity. If you know exactly how the body defends against T-virus, you can engineer pathogens that sidestep those defenses entirely.

Enhanced Countermeasures: Grace’s evolved antibodies could be reverse-engineered into more effective vaccines and treatments, providing superior protection for select groups while leaving others vulnerable.

Strategic Biological Advantage: Controlling the source of T-virus immunity means controlling who lives and who dies in future bioweapons conflicts. It’s the ultimate strategic asset in an age of biological warfare.

The Thirty-Year Hunt

The systematic targeting of both Alyssa and Grace Ashcroft suggests this conspiracy has been decades in the making. Whoever is behind these abductions has been patient, methodical, and well-informed about Raccoon City’s survivors and their biological significance.

Think about the logistics involved: tracking survivors across thirty years, monitoring their families, waiting for the right moment to strike. This level of coordination requires significant resources and long-term planning. It also suggests the organization behind it has been studying bioweapons immunity far longer than anyone realized.

Alyssa’s murder eight years ago might not have been about silencing her investigation at all – it could have been a failed abduction attempt. Perhaps they tried to take her alive for blood harvesting, and only killed her when extraction became impossible. Grace, however, represents an even more valuable target: younger, healthier, and carrying three decades of evolved immunity.

The Government Connection

The U.S. government’s interest in Raccoon City survivors extends far beyond simple witness protection. Leon Kennedy’s recruitment into federal service, Sherry Birkin’s government custody, and the systematic monitoring of other survivors all point to an official recognition of their biological value.

But what if the government wasn’t just studying survivors – what if they were breeding them? Encouraging survivor families to have children, monitoring their health, waiting for the right moment to harvest the next generation’s enhanced immunity. Grace’s FBI career might not have been her choice at all, but rather a convenient way to keep a valuable asset under official supervision.

The timing of Grace’s abduction, occurring during an official FBI investigation, suggests either government complicity or a rival organization with the power to operate against federal agents. Either scenario points to bioweapons research operating at the highest levels of power.

The Connections’ Endgame

Director Koshi Nakanishi’s involvement in both RE7 and RE9 strongly suggests The Connections criminal syndicate plays a role in Grace’s story. This organization, led by figures like Brandon Bailey who harbored deep grudges against Umbrella, has always represented a more insidious threat than corporate bioweapons development.

Consider their possible endgame: if The Connections orchestrated Umbrella’s downfall through the Raccoon City incident, they might have been planning to harvest survivor immunity from the very beginning. Create the problem, eliminate the competition, then control the solution. It’s a decades-long strategy that would make them the dominant force in bioweapons defense while positioning competitors as the villains.

The Daylight vaccine survivors aren’t just witnesses to The Connections’ success – they’re the final piece of their biological weapons monopoly. With Grace’s blood, they could develop countermeasures that protect their own operatives while leaving enemies vulnerable to bioweapons attacks.

The Weaponized Cure

Perhaps most disturbing is the possibility that Grace’s antibodies could themselves become weapons. Advanced bioweapons research could use her immunity as a delivery system for new pathogens – creating “trojan horse” treatments that appear to provide protection while actually introducing novel biological agents.

Imagine a scenario where The Connections offers Grace’s enhanced antibodies as a miracle cure to governments worldwide, only to discover too late that the treatment carries a secondary payload. They could simultaneously protect their allies and eliminate their enemies through a single biological agent masquerading as humanitarian aid.

This strategy would explain the careful cultivation of second-generation survivors. The Connections wouldn’t just need the antibodies – they’d need them from subjects with clean genetic lines and robust immune systems. Grace represents the perfect candidate: young, healthy, and carrying three decades of evolutionary adaptation.

The Outbreak That Never Ended

RE9’s premise suggests the Raccoon City incident never truly ended – it just went underground. The mysterious deaths Grace was investigating, her mother’s murder, and the ongoing abductions all point to active bioweapons research continuing thirty years after the city’s destruction.

Grace’s blood connects these modern incidents to the original outbreak through an unbroken biological chain. Her antibodies are living proof that someone has been maintaining continuity between past and present bioweapons programs. The cure that should have ended the nightmare has instead become the foundation for new horrors.

The Ultimate Biological Weapon

In the wrong hands, Grace’s enhanced T-virus immunity could spawn the next generation of bioweapons – pathogens designed specifically to overcome humanity’s hard-won defenses. Her blood doesn’t just represent protection; it represents the blueprint for bypassing that protection entirely.

The organization hunting the Ashcroft family isn’t trying to prevent another outbreak – they’re trying to perfect one. They want to create bioweapons that can kill even those with natural immunity, ensuring no one can survive what’s coming next.

Grace awakening on that medical table isn’t the beginning of her story – it’s the culmination of a thirty-year biological warfare program that began with her mother’s survival. The Daylight vaccine that once represented hope for humanity’s future might now herald its darkest hour.

The cure, it turns out, was never meant to save everyone. It was meant to identify who’s worth saving – and who isn’t.